Rocha R O, Ardenghi T M, Oliveira L B, Rodrigues C R M D, Ciamponi A L
Department of Stomatology, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.
Caries Res. 2003 Nov-Dec;37(6):437-41. doi: 10.1159/000073396.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the in vivo effectiveness of laser fluorescence compared to visual inspection and radiography for the detection of occlusal caries in primary teeth. Fifty sites from 30 molars in 29 patients were selected and evaluated under standardized conditions by 2 previously trained examiners according to the 3 diagnostic methods. Histological examination served as gold standard after exfoliation or extraction. Values obtained for sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 0.60, 0.90 and 0.73 for laser fluorescence, 0.82, 0.85 and 0.84 for visual inspection and 0.62, 0.73 and 0.67 for radiography, respectively. Considering only dentinal caries, values were 0.73, 0.95 and 0.90 for laser fluorescence, 0.61, 1.00 and 0.90 for visual inspection and 0.96, 0.81 and 0.85 for radiography, respectively. We conclude that for the detection of occlusal caries in primary molars laser fluorescence presents a similar accuracy when compared to visual inspection and radiography, although visual inspection showed better values for sensitivities for both enamel and dentin lesions.
本研究的目的是评估与目视检查和X线摄影相比,激光荧光在检测乳牙咬合面龋方面的体内有效性。从29例患者的30颗磨牙中选取50个部位,由2名经过先前培训的检查者根据3种诊断方法在标准化条件下进行评估。在乳牙脱落或拔除后,组织学检查作为金标准。激光荧光的灵敏度、特异度和准确度分别为0.60、0.90和0.73,目视检查分别为0.82、0.85和0.84,X线摄影分别为0.62、0.73和0.67。仅考虑牙本质龋时,激光荧光的数值分别为0.73、0.95和0.90,目视检查分别为0.61、1.00和0.90,X线摄影分别为0.96、0.81和0.85。我们得出结论,在检测乳牙磨牙咬合面龋方面,与目视检查和X线摄影相比,激光荧光的准确度相似,尽管目视检查在釉质和牙本质病变的灵敏度方面显示出更好的数值。