Saksena Sanjeev, Madan Nandini
Arrhythmia and Pacemaker Service, Cardiovascular Institute, Atlantic Health System, Passaic, NJ, USA.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2003 Oct;9(2):235-47. doi: 10.1023/a:1026296710161.
Rhythm control methods have not shown superior outcomes to rate control strategies in atrial fibrillation. Newer approaches to rhythm control employ "hybrid" therapies combining pharmacologic and non pharmacologic interventions. Pathophysiologic insights into mechanisms of atrial fibrillation (AF) suggest that arrhythmogenesis is due to interactions of multiple triggering rhythms and a complex electrophysiologic substrate resulting in the emergence of multiple tachyarrhythmias, often in disparate locations that may coexist in time. Thus, an "hybrid" therapy prescription is more likely to address several of the etiologic factors culminating in clinical AF. Results of pilot clinical studies of hybrid therapy are encouraging and involve drugs, devices and ablation techniques in varying permutations. Hybrid therapy algorithms using right heart procedures can improve efficacy with potentially lower risk. Considerations in implementation of these algorithms include staged or simultaneous interventions and a right versus left heart strategy. The parallel with the current coronary disease management paradigm is obvious and relevant.
在心房颤动中,节律控制方法并未显示出比心率控制策略更优的效果。新型节律控制方法采用了结合药物和非药物干预的“混合”疗法。对心房颤动(AF)机制的病理生理学见解表明,心律失常的发生是由于多种触发节律与复杂的电生理基质相互作用,导致多种快速性心律失常出现,这些心律失常往往发生在不同位置,可能同时存在。因此,“混合”疗法处方更有可能解决导致临床房颤的多个病因。混合疗法的初步临床研究结果令人鼓舞,涉及药物、器械和消融技术的不同组合。使用右心程序的混合疗法算法可以提高疗效,同时潜在风险可能更低。实施这些算法时需要考虑的因素包括分期或同时进行干预以及右心与左心策略。这与当前冠心病管理模式的相似之处是显而易见且相关的。