Copley Susan J, Wells Athol U, Sivakumaran Pathanamathan, Rubens Michael B, Lee Y C Gary, Desai Sujal R, MacDonald Sharyn L S, Thompson Richard I, Colby Thomas V, Nicholson Andrew G, du Bois Roland M, Musk A William, Hansell David M
Department of Radiology, Hammersmith Hospital, London, England.
Radiology. 2003 Dec;229(3):731-6. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2293020668. Epub 2003 Oct 23.
To identify differences, if any, in thin-section computed tomographic (CT) features between asbestosis and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and to test the findings in a subset of histopathologically proved cases of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP).
Consecutive patients with a diagnosis of IPF (n = 212) or asbestosis (n = 74) were included. The relationships derived from the initial comparison were tested in a separate group of biopsy-proved UIP (n = 30) and NSIP (n = 23) cases. Two observers independently scored thin-section CT images for extent, distribution, and coarseness of fibrosis; proportion of ground-glass opacification; severity of traction bronchiectasis; and extent of emphysema.
After controlling for extent of fibrosis, patients with asbestosis had coarser fibrosis than those with IPF (odds ratio, 1.52; 95% CI: 1.25, 1.84; P <.001). Compared with the biopsy-proved cases, the asbestosis cases involved coarser fibrosis (after controlling for disease extent) than the NSIP cases (odds ratio, 2.48; 95% CI: 1.49, 4.11; P <.001) but fibrosis similar to that in the UIP cases. A basal and subpleural distribution of disease was usual in all subgroups but significantly more prevalent (P, <.01 to.001) with asbestosis than with UIP or NSIP.
The thin-section CT pattern of asbestosis closely resembles that of biopsy-proved UIP and differs markedly from that of biopsy-proved NSIP.
确定石棉肺与特发性肺纤维化(IPF)在薄层计算机断层扫描(CT)特征上是否存在差异,并在一组经组织病理学证实的普通间质性肺炎(UIP)和非特异性间质性肺炎(NSIP)病例子集中验证这些发现。
纳入连续诊断为IPF(n = 212)或石棉肺(n = 74)的患者。在另一组经活检证实的UIP(n = 30)和NSIP(n = 23)病例中测试从初始比较得出的关系。两名观察者独立对薄层CT图像的纤维化范围、分布和粗细程度、磨玻璃样变的比例、牵拉性支气管扩张的严重程度以及肺气肿的范围进行评分。
在控制纤维化范围后,石棉肺患者的纤维化比IPF患者更粗(优势比,1.52;95%可信区间:1.25,1.84;P <.001)。与经活检证实的病例相比,石棉肺病例(在控制疾病范围后)的纤维化比NSIP病例更粗(优势比,2.48;95%可信区间:1.49,4.11;P <.001),但与UIP病例的纤维化相似。所有亚组中疾病的基底和胸膜下分布都很常见,但石棉肺比UIP或NSIP更显著(P <.01至.001)。
石棉肺的薄层CT表现与经活检证实的UIP非常相似,与经活检证实的NSIP明显不同。