A comparison of targeting performance of oncoretroviral versus lentiviral vectors on human keratinocytes.

The epidermis, like other rapidly renewing tissues, relies on a stem cell compartment to undergo constant regeneration. In order to develop realistic and long-lasting therapeutic approaches for some skin disorders, gene transfer to these critical cells must be obtained. While efficient retroviral ex vivo targeting and transgene integration in human keratinocytes is tightly dependent on proliferation, transferring genetic information to quiescent cells in culture also presents advantages, including the possibility of targeting putative dormant epidermal stem cells. In the present study we compared the efficiency of transduction achieved with a third-generation of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-based lentiviral vector to that obtained with a Moloney murine leukemia oncoretroviral vector (MLV) on proliferating and quiescent human keratinocytes growing in vitro in standard Rheinwald and Green cultures as well as in confluent organotypic cultures. Each viral vector contained the enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) as a reporter gene. The lentiviral vector, but not the MLV vector, led to EGFP expression both in nondividing and proliferating epidermal cell populations in vitro. This feature was clearly evident when direct targeting of human keratinocytes, forming part of the epidermal component of an organotypic skin culture, was attempted. Keratinocytes modified by both MLV and the lentiviral vector allowed long-term regeneration of genetically engineered human skin on the backs of immunodeficient nonobese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficiency disorders (NOD/SCID) mice. However, EGFP transgene expression in the context of the MLV (long-terminal repeat [LTR]-driven) or lentiviral vector (cytomegalovirus [CMV]-driven) demonstrated clear differences both in quantitative terms and in the in vivo localization pattern.