Ferracane Jack L, Mitchem John C
Department of Biomaterials and Biomechanics, Oregon Health & Science University, 611 S.W. Campus Drive, Portland, Oregon 97239, USA.
Am J Dent. 2003 Aug;16(4):239-43.
The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between polymerization contraction stress and leakage in Class V composites.
A microfill (Heliomolar) and two minifill hybrid composites (Herculite, Z100) were tested. Maximum contraction stress (n = 5) for the composites was evaluated in a MTS machine at a C-factor of 3 (ratio of bonded to non-bonded surface area). Composite was placed in the gap between the surfaces of glass stubs that had been air abraded, silane treated and coated with a layer of resin adhesive. Specimens were light-cured through the top glass stub for 60 seconds and maximum force was recorded during the first 10 minutes. Leakage (n = 10) was evaluated by cutting cylindrical cavity preparations with all enamel margins (C-factor = 3) in bovine incisors. The cavities were treated with two layers of Scotchbond MP adhesive. Composites were applied in one increment, light-cured at the same intensity used in the stress tests, and immediately finished on SiC paper. After 1 day in water, the restorations were placed in silver nitrate, developed and evaluated as a single cross-section (2-D) and multiple cross-sections (3-D) for leakage: 0 (none), 1 (minimal leakage), 2 (to the DEJ), 3 (to line angle), 4 (along the pulpal wall).
The maximum stresses (MPa) recorded were lowest for Heliomolar (7.0 +/- 0.4), intermediate for Herculite (10.5 +/- 0.6) and greatest for Z100 (11.6 +/- 1.3). 3-D leakage was as follows: Heliomolar--two specimens scored 1, seven scored 2 and one scored 3; Herculite--six scored 2 and four scored 3; Z100--eight scored 3 and two scored 4. The Kruskal-Wallis test showed a significant difference in leakage for the three composites (P < 0.05), and leakage was greater when evaluated in 3-D. The leakage results correlated with the stress values, i.e. composites with higher contraction stress showed more extensive marginal leakage.
本研究旨在确定Ⅴ类复合树脂聚合收缩应力与边缘渗漏之间的关系。
测试了一种微填料复合树脂(Heliomolar)和两种小填料混合复合树脂(Herculite、Z100)。在MTS试验机上,以C因子为3(粘结表面积与非粘结表面积之比)评估复合树脂的最大收缩应力(n = 5)。将复合树脂置于经空气喷砂、硅烷处理并涂有一层树脂粘结剂的玻璃短柱表面之间的间隙中。通过顶部玻璃短柱对试件进行60秒光固化,并记录前10分钟内的最大力。通过在牛切牙上制备全釉质边缘的圆柱形洞型(C因子 = 3)来评估边缘渗漏(n = 10)。用两层Scotchbond MP粘结剂处理洞型。一次性填入复合树脂,以与应力测试相同的强度进行光固化,并立即在碳化硅纸上修整。在水中放置1天后,将修复体置于硝酸银中,显影后评估其二维和三维边缘渗漏情况:0级(无渗漏)、1级(轻微渗漏)、2级(至牙本质-釉质界)、3级(至线角)、4级(沿髓壁)。
记录到的最大应力(MPa),Heliomolar最低(7.0±0.4),Herculite居中(10.5±0.6),Z100最高(11.6±1.3)。三维边缘渗漏情况如下:Heliomolar——2个试件评为1级,7个评为2级,1个评为3级;Herculite——6个评为2级,4个评为3级;Z100——8个评为3级,2个评为4级。Kruskal-Wallis检验显示三种复合树脂在边缘渗漏方面存在显著差异(P < 0.05),且三维评估时边缘渗漏更严重。边缘渗漏结果与应力值相关,即收缩应力较高的复合树脂边缘渗漏更广泛。