Gerlach K, Uhlig T, Hüppe M, Nowak G, Schmitz A, Saager L, Grasteit A, Schmucker P
University Hospital Lübeck, Department of Anaesthesiology, Lübeck, Germany.
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2003 Oct;20(10):813-20.
Remifentanil has unique pharmacokinetics that might allow faster recovery after neurosurgery. We investigated the effects of a propofol/sufentanil versus a remifentanil/propofol regimen on the primary end-point tracheal extubation time.
In the Neurosurgery Department of a University Hospital, 36 patients awaiting craniotomy for supratentorial tumour resection were randomly assigned to one of two study groups. In the sufentanil/propofol group, anaesthesia was induced with 0.5 microg kg(-1) sufentanil and 1-2 mg kg(-1) propofol. Propofol infusion and boluses of sufentanil were administered for maintenance. In the remifentanil/propofol group, anaesthesia was started with an infusion of remifentanil (0.2-0.35 microg kg(-1) min(-1)) and a bolus of propofol (1.5-2 mg kg(-1)). Patients received a propofol infusion and a remifentanil infusion for maintenance of anaesthesia. Recovery times were taken from cessation of the propofol infusion. In addition, data about self-reported nausea and vomiting, pain and analgesic requirements were collected.
Patients in the remifentanil/propofol group were extubated earlier (mean times 6.4 (+/- SD 4.7) versus 14.3 (+/- 9.2) min; P = 0.003). The two groups were similar with respect to postoperative nausea and vomiting, and patient-reported pain scores. Fifty per cent of the remifentanil/propofol patients and 88% of the sufentanil/propofol patients required no analgesics within 1 h after operation (P = 0.03).
The remifentanil/propofol regimen provided quicker recovery. The two regimens were similar in terms of postoperative nausea and vomiting and patient-reported pain scores, but patients in the remifentanil/ propofol group required more analgesics within 1 h postoperatively.
瑞芬太尼具有独特的药代动力学特性,这可能使神经外科手术后恢复更快。我们研究了丙泊酚/舒芬太尼方案与瑞芬太尼/丙泊酚方案对主要终点气管拔管时间的影响。
在一所大学医院的神经外科,36例等待幕上肿瘤切除开颅手术的患者被随机分配到两个研究组之一。在舒芬太尼/丙泊酚组,用0.5μg/kg舒芬太尼和1 - 2mg/kg丙泊酚诱导麻醉。持续输注丙泊酚并给予舒芬太尼推注以维持麻醉。在瑞芬太尼/丙泊酚组,开始麻醉时输注瑞芬太尼(0.2 - 0.35μg/kg·min)和推注丙泊酚(1.5 - 2mg/kg)。患者持续输注丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼以维持麻醉。恢复时间从丙泊酚输注停止时开始计算。此外,收集了关于自我报告的恶心呕吐、疼痛及镇痛需求的数据。
瑞芬太尼/丙泊酚组患者拔管更早(平均时间分别为6.4(±标准差4.7)分钟和14.3(±9.2)分钟;P = 0.003)。两组在术后恶心呕吐及患者报告的疼痛评分方面相似。50%的瑞芬太尼/丙泊酚组患者和88%的舒芬太尼/丙泊酚组患者术后1小时内不需要镇痛(P = 0.03)。
瑞芬太尼/丙泊酚方案恢复更快。两种方案在术后恶心呕吐及患者报告的疼痛评分方面相似,但瑞芬太尼/丙泊酚组患者术后1小时内需要更多镇痛药物。