Sullivan Daniel, Faccio Rodrick, Levy Michael L, Grossman Robert G
Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90033, USA.
Neurosurgery. 2003 Nov;53(5):1019-25; discussion 1025-27. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000089480.86634.fc.
SUBSTANTIAL LITERATURE EXISTS on the assassination and subsequent pathological examination of President John F. Kennedy. The Warren Report, the United States Government's official report on the assassination, instead of providing definitive answers on the precise cause of President Kennedy's death, sparked intense and on-going debate. Since the publication of the Warren Report in September 1964, many issues have been woven into a wide array of theories concerning the assassination. One element continues to generate debate, namely, the exact sites of the wounds that President Kennedy sustained. A neuroforensic analysis of the wounds, from the perspective of the neurosurgeon, would establish a reasonable hypothesis for the mechanics of the shooting. Eyewitness accounts of the events surrounding the assassination represent one critical source of data for such an analysis. This report provides a previously undocumented neurosurgeon's eyewitness account of what transpired in Trauma Room 1 of Parkland Memorial Hospital on November 22, 1963.
关于约翰·F·肯尼迪总统遇刺及随后的病理检查,有大量文献资料。美国政府关于此次刺杀事件的官方报告《沃伦报告》,并未就肯尼迪总统确切的死因给出明确答案,反而引发了激烈且持续不断的争论。自1964年9月《沃伦报告》发布以来,许多问题被纳入了关于此次刺杀事件的众多理论之中。有一个因素持续引发争论,即肯尼迪总统受伤的确切部位。从神经外科医生的角度对伤口进行神经法医学分析,将为枪击的机制建立一个合理的假设。围绕刺杀事件的目击证人陈述是此类分析的一个关键数据来源。本报告提供了一位神经外科医生此前未被记录的目击陈述,讲述了1963年11月22日在帕克兰纪念医院1号创伤室发生的事情。