Yu Cheng, Jozsef Gabor, Apuzzo Michael L J, Petrovich Zbigniew
Department of Radiation Oncology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90033-0804, USA.
Neurosurgery. 2003 Nov;53(5):1155-62; discussion 1162-3. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000088805.01793.5a.
To compare treatment plans obtained with the CyberKnife (CK) (Accuray, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) with those of other commonly used radiosurgical modalities, such as the gamma knife (GK), linear accelerator multiple arcs, conformally shaped static fields, and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).
An ellipsoidal simulated target was chosen centrally located in a three-dimensional model of a patient's head acquired with magnetic resonance or computed tomographic imaging. It was 25 mm in diameter and 35 mm long. The aims of treatment plans were 100% target volume coverage with an appropriate isodose line, minimum radiation dose to normal tissue, and clinically acceptable delivery. These plans were evaluated by use of a dose-volume histogram and other commonly used radiosurgical parameters such as target coverage, homogeneity index, and conformity index.
All selected treatment modalities were equivalent in providing full target coverage. For dose homogeneity, all modalities except for multiple isocenter plans for GK (homogeneity index, 2.0) were similar (homogeneity index, congruent with 1.25). Dose conformity was essentially equivalent for all treatment plans except for IMRT, which had a slightly higher value (conformity index, congruent with 1.27). There was a substantial variation in the radiation dose to normal tissue between the studied modalities, particularly at the lower dose levels.
CK plans seemed to be more flexible for a given target size and shape. For a target of limited volume and essentially of any shape, one could obtain similarly good conformal dosimetry with CK and GK. For a regular-shaped but other than spherical target, homogeneous dose distribution could be obtained with all selected modalities except for multiple isocenters, linear accelerator multiple arcs, or GK. Both IMRT and conformally shaped static fields offered good alternative treatment modalities to CK, GK, or linear accelerator multiple arc radiosurgery, with slightly inferior dosimetry in conformity (IMRT).
比较使用射波刀(CK)(Accuray公司,加利福尼亚州桑尼维尔)获得的治疗计划与其他常用放射外科治疗方式的治疗计划,如伽马刀(GK)、直线加速器多弧、适形静态野和调强放射治疗(IMRT)。
在通过磁共振成像或计算机断层扫描成像获取的患者头部三维模型中,选择一个位于中心的椭圆形模拟靶区。其直径为25毫米,长35毫米。治疗计划的目标是用合适的等剂量线实现100%靶区覆盖、对正常组织的辐射剂量最小化以及临床上可接受的剂量分布。通过使用剂量体积直方图和其他常用的放射外科参数(如靶区覆盖度、均匀性指数和适形指数)对这些计划进行评估。
所有选定的治疗方式在实现完全靶区覆盖方面相当。对于剂量均匀性,除了GK的多个等中心计划(均匀性指数为2.0)外,所有方式都相似(均匀性指数约为1.25)。除IMRT外,所有治疗计划的剂量适形性基本相当,IMRT的值略高(适形指数约为1.27)。在所研究的治疗方式之间,对正常组织的辐射剂量存在很大差异,尤其是在较低剂量水平。
对于给定的靶区大小和形状,CK计划似乎更具灵活性。对于体积有限且基本为任何形状的靶区,使用CK和GK可获得类似良好的适形剂量学。对于规则形状但非球形的靶区,除了多个等中心、直线加速器多弧或GK外,所有选定的方式都可获得均匀的剂量分布。IMRT和适形静态野都为CK、GK或直线加速器多弧放射外科提供了良好的替代治疗方式,只是在适形性方面剂量学稍差(IMRT)。