Ratto M H, Singh J, Huanca W, Adams G P
Department of Veterinary Biomedical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, 52 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, Canada S7N 5B4.
Theriogenology. 2003 Dec;60(9):1645-56. doi: 10.1016/s0093-691x(03)00176-6.
The study was designed to compare the efficacy of treatments intended to induce follicular wave synchronization among llamas (Experiment 1), and to determine the effect of these treatments on pregnancy rates after fixed-time natural mating (Experiment 2). In Experiment 1, llamas were treated with: (1) saline (control, n=20); (2) estradiol and progesterone (E/P, n=20); (3) LH (LH, n=20); or (4) transvaginal ultrasound-guided follicle ablation (FA, n=20). The ovarian response was monitored daily by transrectal ultrasonography. The intervals from treatment to follicular wave emergence and to the day on which the new dominant follicle reached >/=7 mm, respectively, did not differ between the LH (2.1+/-0.3 days and 5.2+/-0.5 days, respectively) and FA groups (2.3+/-0.3 days and 5.0+/-0.5 days), but both were shorter (P<0.05) and less variable (P<0.01) than in the control group (5.5+/-1.0 days and 8.4+/-2.0 days), while the E/P group (4.5+/-0.8 days and 7.7+/-0.5 days) was intermediate. In Experiment 2, llamas at unknown stages of follicular development were assigned randomly to control, E/P, and LH groups (n=30 per group). A single, fixed-time natural mating was permitted 10-12 days after treatment. Ovulation rates did not differ among groups (control, 93%; E/P, 90%; LH, 90%; P=0.99), but the pregnancy rate was higher (P<0.05) for synchronized llamas (LH and E/P groups combined, 41/54) than for non-synchronized llamas (control group, 15/28). In conclusion, LH and FA treatments were most effective for inducing follicular wave synchronization, while E/P treatment was intermediate. Synchronization treatments did not influence ovulation rate subsequent to fixed-time natural mating, but a higher pregnancy rate in synchronized than non-synchronized llamas warrants critical evaluation of the effects of follicular status on the developmental competence of the contained oocyte.
本研究旨在比较旨在诱导美洲驼卵泡波同步化的治疗方法的疗效(实验1),并确定这些治疗方法对定时自然交配后妊娠率的影响(实验2)。在实验1中,美洲驼接受以下治疗:(1)生理盐水(对照组,n = 20);(2)雌二醇和孕酮(E/P,n = 20);(3)促黄体生成素(LH,n = 20);或(4)经阴道超声引导下卵泡消融(FA,n = 20)。每天通过经直肠超声检查监测卵巢反应。LH组(分别为2.1±0.3天和5.2±0.5天)和FA组(分别为2.3±0.3天和5.0±0.5天)从治疗到卵泡波出现以及到新的优势卵泡直径≥7 mm当天的间隔时间,与对照组(5.5±1.0天和8.4±2.0天)相比,均较短(P<0.05)且变异性较小(P<0.01),而E/P组(4.5±0.8天和7.7±0.5天)介于两者之间。在实验2中,处于卵泡发育未知阶段的美洲驼被随机分配到对照组、E/P组和LH组(每组n = 30)。治疗后10 - 12天允许进行单次定时自然交配。各组排卵率无差异(对照组93%;E/P组90%;LH组90%;P = 0.99),但同步化的美洲驼(LH组和E/P组合并,41/54)的妊娠率高于未同步化的美洲驼(对照组, 15/28)(P<0.05)。总之,LH和FA治疗在诱导卵泡波同步化方面最有效,而E/P治疗效果居中。同步化治疗不影响定时自然交配后的排卵率,但同步化美洲驼的妊娠率高于未同步化的美洲驼,这值得对卵泡状态对其中所含卵母细胞发育能力的影响进行严格评估。