Suppr超能文献

戊酸雌二醇对孕激素处理母牛卵巢卵泡动态及超数排卵反应的影响

Effect of estradiol valerate on ovarian follicle dynamics and superovulatory response in progestin-treated cattle.

作者信息

Colazo M G, Martínez M F, Small J A, Kastelic J P, Burnley C A, Ward D R, Mapletoft R J

机构信息

Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask., Canada S7N 5B4.

出版信息

Theriogenology. 2005 Mar 15;63(5):1454-68. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.07.004.

Abstract

Three experiments evaluated the effects of estradiol valerate (EV) on ovarian follicular and CL dynamics, intervals to estrus and ovulation, and superovulatory response in cattle. Experiment 1 compared the efficacy of two norgestomet ear implants (Crestar and Syncro-Mate B; SMB) for 9 d (with PGF at implant removal), combined with either 5 mg estradiol-17beta and 100 mg progesterone (EP) or 5 mg EV and 3mg norgestomet (EN) im at the time of implant insertion on CL diameter and follicular wave dynamics. Ovaries were monitored by ultrasonography. There was no effect of norgestomet implant. Diameter of the CL decreased following EN treatment (P < 0.01). Mean (+/- S.D.) day of follicular wave emergence (FWE) was earlier (P < 0.0001) and less variable (P < 0.0001) in EP- (3.6 +/- 0.5 d) than in EN- (5.7 +/- 1.5 d) treated heifers. Intervals from implant removal to estrus (P < 0.001) and ovulation (P < 0.01) were shorter in EN- (45.7 +/- 11.7 and 74.3 +/- 12.6 h, respectively) than in EP- (56.4 +/- 14.1 and 83.3 +/- 17.0 h, respectively) treated heifers. Experiment 2 compared the efficacy of EP versus EN in synchronizing FWE for superovulation in SMB-implanted cows. At random stages of the estrous cycle, Holstein cows (n = 78) received two SMB implants (Day 0) and were randomly assigned to receive EN on Day 0 or EP on Day 1. Folltropin-V treatments were initiated on the evening of Day 5, with PGF in the morning and evening of Day 8, when SMB were removed. Cows were inseminated after the onset of estrus and embryos were recovered 7 d later. Non-lactating cows had more CL (16.7 +/- 11.3 versus 8.3 +/- 4.9) and total ova/embryos (14.7 +/- 9.5 versus 7.9 +/- 4.6) than lactating cows (P < 0.05). EP-treated cows tended (P = 0.09) to yield more transferable embryos (5.6 +/- 5.2) than EN-treated cows (4.0 +/- 3.7). Experiment 3 compared the effect of dose of EV on ovarian follicle and CL growth profiles and synchrony of estrus and ovulation in CIDR-treated beef cows (n = 43). At random stages of the estrous cycle (Day 0), cows received a CIDR and no further treatment (Control), or an injection of 1, 2, or 5 mg im of EV. On Day 7, CIDR were removed and cows received PGF. Follicular wave emergence occurred within 7 d in 7/10 Control cows and 31/32 EV-treated cows (P < 0.05). In responding cows, interval from treatment to FWE was longer (P < 0.05) in those treated with 5 mg EV (4.8 +/- 1.2 d) than in those treated with 1 mg (3.2 +/- 0.9 d) or 2 mg (3.4 +/- 0.8 d) EV, while Control cows were intermediate (3.8 +/- 2.0 d). Diameter of the dominant follicle was smaller (P < 0.05) at CIDR removal and tended (P = 0.08) to be smaller just prior to ovulation in the 5 mg EV group (8.5 +/- 2.2 and 13.2 +/- 0.6 mm, respectively) than in the Control (11.8 +/- 4.6 and 15.5 +/- 2.9 mm, respectively) or 1mg EV (11.7 +/- 2.5 and 15.1 +/- 2.2 mm, respectively) groups, with the 2mg EV group (10.7 +/- 1.5 and 14.3 +/- 1.7 mm, respectively) intermediate. Diameter of the dominant follicle at CIDR removal was less variable (P < 0.01) in the 2 and 5mg EV groups than in the Control group, and intermediate in the 1mg EV group. In summary, treatment with 5mg EV resulted in a longer and more variable interval to follicular wave emergence than treatment with 5mg estradiol-17beta, which affected preovulatory dominant follicle size following progestin removal, and may have also affected superstimulatory response in Holstein cows. Additionally, 5 mg EV appeared to induce luteolysis in heifers, reducing the interval to ovulation following norgestomet removal. Conversely, intervals to, and synchrony of, follicular wave emergence, estrus and ovulation following treatment with 1 or 2 mg EV suggested that reduced doses of EV may be more useful for the synchronization of follicular wave emergence in progestogen-treated cattle.

摘要

三项实验评估了戊酸雌二醇(EV)对牛卵巢卵泡和黄体动态、发情和排卵间隔以及超排反应的影响。实验1比较了两种诺孕美特耳部植入剂(Crestar和Syncro - Mate B;SMB)在9天(在取出植入剂时注射前列腺素F2α)的效果,在植入植入剂时联合注射5毫克17β - 雌二醇和100毫克孕酮(EP)或5毫克EV和3毫克诺孕美特(EN),对黄体直径和卵泡波动态的影响。通过超声检查监测卵巢。诺孕美特植入剂没有效果。EN处理后黄体直径减小(P < 0.01)。与EN处理的小母牛(5.7 +/- 1.5天)相比,EP处理的小母牛(3.6 +/- 0.5天)卵泡波出现(FWE)的平均(+/-标准差)天数更早(P < 0.0001)且变异性更小(P < 0.0001)。从取出植入剂到发情(P < 0.001)和排卵(P < 0.01)的间隔,EN处理的小母牛(分别为45.7 +/- 11.7和74.3 +/- 12.6小时)比EP处理的小母牛(分别为56.4 +/- 14.1和83.3 +/- 17.0小时)更短。实验2比较了EP和EN在同步FWE以用于SMB植入的母牛超排中的效果。在发情周期的随机阶段,荷斯坦奶牛(n = 78)接受两个SMB植入剂(第0天),并随机分配在第0天接受EN或在第1天接受EP。在第5天晚上开始使用Folltropin - V处理,在第8天早上和晚上注射前列腺素F2α,此时取出SMB。奶牛在发情开始后进行人工授精,并在7天后回收胚胎。非泌乳奶牛比泌乳奶牛有更多的黄体(16.7 +/- 11.3对8.3 +/- 4.9)和总卵子/胚胎(14.7 +/- 9.5对7.9 +/- 4.6)(P < 0.05)。EP处理的奶牛比EN处理的奶牛倾向于(P = 0.09)产生更多可移植胚胎(5.6 +/- 5.2)(4.0 +/- 3.7)。实验3比较了EV剂量对经阴道孕酮释放装置(CIDR)处理的肉牛(n = 43)卵巢卵泡和黄体生长曲线以及发情和排卵同步性的影响。在发情周期的随机阶段(第0天),奶牛接受一个CIDR且不再接受进一步处理(对照),或肌肉注射1、2或5毫克EV。在第7天,取出CIDR并给奶牛注射前列腺素F2α。7/10的对照奶牛和31/32的EV处理奶牛在7天内出现卵泡波(P < 0.05)。在有反应的奶牛中,5毫克EV处理的奶牛从处理到FWE的间隔(4.8 +/- 1.2天)比1毫克(3.2 +/- 0.9天)或2毫克(3.4 +/- 0.8天)EV处理的奶牛更长(P < 0.05),而对照奶牛处于中间水平(3.8 +/- 2.0天)。在取出CIDR时,5毫克EV组优势卵泡直径较小(P < 0.05),并且在排卵前倾向于(P = 0.08)比对照组(分别为11.8 +/- 4.6和15.5 +/- 2.9毫米)或1毫克EV组(分别为11.7 +/- 2.5和15.1 +/- 2.2毫米)更小(分别为8.5 +/- 2.2和13.2 +/- 0.6毫米),2毫克EV组(分别为10.7 +/- 1.5和14.3 +/- 1.7毫米)处于中间水平。在取出CIDR时,2毫克和5毫克EV组优势卵泡直径的变异性比对照组小(P < 0.01),1毫克EV组处于中间水平。总之,与5毫克17β - 雌二醇处理相比,5毫克EV处理导致卵泡波出现的间隔更长且变异性更大,这影响了孕激素去除后排卵前优势卵泡的大小,并且可能也影响了荷斯坦奶牛的超排反应。此外,5毫克EV似乎诱导了小母牛的黄体溶解,缩短了诺孕美特去除后到排卵的间隔。相反,1或2毫克EV处理后卵泡波出现、发情和排卵的间隔以及同步性表明,降低剂量的EV可能对孕激素处理的牛同步卵泡波出现更有用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验