• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The TAPS project. 16: Difficult to place, long term psychiatric patients: risk factors for failure to resettle long stay patients in community facilities.TAPS项目。16:安置困难的长期精神病患者:长期住院患者难以在社区设施中重新安置的风险因素。
BMJ. 1992 Oct 24;305(6860):993-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6860.993.
2
The TAPS project. 17: Readmission to hospital for long term psychiatric patients after discharge to the community.TAPS项目。17:长期精神病患者出院回归社区后的再次入院情况。
BMJ. 1992 Oct 24;305(6860):996-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6860.996.
3
Team for the Assessment of Psychiatric Services (TAPS) Project 33: prospective follow-up study of long-stay patients discharged from two psychiatric hospitals.精神科服务评估团队(TAPS)项目33:两家精神病医院出院的长期住院患者的前瞻性随访研究。
Am J Psychiatry. 1996 Oct;153(10):1318-24. doi: 10.1176/ajp.153.10.1318.
4
The TAPS Project. 10: The long-stay populations of Friern and Claybury hospitals. The baseline survey.塔普斯项目。10:弗里恩医院和克莱伯里医院的长期住院患者群体。基线调查。
Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 1993 Apr(19):30-5.
5
[Evaluation of the closure of large psychiatric hospitals in England].[对英格兰大型精神病院关闭情况的评估]
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1993;41(4):292-7.
6
[Closure of large psychiatric hospitals in England: evaluation by the TAPS project--a review of the literature].[英国大型精神病医院的关闭:TAPS项目评估——文献综述]
Psychiatr Prax. 1995 Mar;22(2):50-4.
7
Long-term outcome of long-stay psychiatric in-patients considered unsuitable to live in the community. TAPS Project 44.被认为不适宜在社区生活的长期住院精神科患者的长期预后。TAPS项目44。
Br J Psychiatry. 2002 Nov;181:428-32. doi: 10.1192/bjp.181.5.428.
8
The TAPS Project. 12: Crime, vagrancy, death and readmission of the long-term mentally ill during their first year of local reprovision.TAPS项目。12:长期精神病患者在当地重新安置的第一年中的犯罪、流浪、死亡及再入院情况
Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 1993 Apr(19):40-4.
9
The TAPS Project. 7: Mental hospital closure--a literature review of outcome studies and evaluative techniques.TAPS项目。7:精神病院关闭——结局研究与评估技术的文献综述
Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 1993 Apr(19):7-17.
10
Impact of a rehabilitation legislation on the survival in the community of long-term patients discharged from psychiatric hospitals in Israel.一项康复立法对以色列精神病医院出院的长期患者社区生存情况的影响。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2006 Feb;41(2):87-94. doi: 10.1007/s00127-005-0008-0. Epub 2006 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of psychiatric rehospitalization among elderly patients.老年患者精神科再住院的预测因素
F1000Res. 2015 Sep 30;4:926. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.7135.1. eCollection 2015.
2
Psychiatric rehospitalization following hospital discharge.出院后的精神科再住院治疗。
Community Ment Health J. 1997 Feb;33(1):13-24. doi: 10.1023/a:1022409009436.
3
Reed report on mentally disordered offenders.里德关于精神错乱罪犯的报告。
BMJ. 1992 Dec 12;305(6867):1448-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6867.1448.

本文引用的文献

1
The measurement of social behaviour in psychiatric patients: an assessment of the reliability and validity of the SBS schedule.精神病患者社会行为的测量:SBS量表信效度评估
Br J Psychiatry. 1986 Jan;148:1-11. doi: 10.1192/bjp.148.1.1.
2
The future of Britain's mental hospitals.英国精神病院的未来。
BMJ. 1989 Nov 18;299(6710):1237-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6710.1237.
3
The functions of asylum.收容所的功能。
Br J Psychiatry. 1990 Dec;157:822-7. doi: 10.1192/bjp.157.6.822.
4
The TAPS Project. 4: An observational study of the social life of long-stay patients.TAPS项目。4:长期住院患者社交生活的观察性研究。
Br J Psychiatry. 1990 Dec;157:842-8, 852. doi: 10.1192/bjp.157.6.842.
5
The TAPS Project. 5: The structure of social-network data obtained from long-stay patients.TAPS项目。5:从长期住院患者获取的社交网络数据结构
Br J Psychiatry. 1990 Dec;157:848-52. doi: 10.1192/bjp.157.6.848.
6
"Difficult to place" psychiatric patients.安置困难的精神病患者
BMJ. 1991 Mar 16;302(6777):603-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6777.603.

TAPS项目。16:安置困难的长期精神病患者:长期住院患者难以在社区设施中重新安置的风险因素。

The TAPS project. 16: Difficult to place, long term psychiatric patients: risk factors for failure to resettle long stay patients in community facilities.

作者信息

Dayson D, Gooch C, Thornicroft G

机构信息

TAPS Research Unit, Friern Hospital, London.

出版信息

BMJ. 1992 Oct 24;305(6860):993-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6860.993.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.305.6860.993
PMID:1458147
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1883985/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify patients who could not be resettled in the community as part of the closure plans of two psychiatric hospitals and to determine their numbers and risk factors for failure.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Prospective study of the closure of Friern and Claybury psychiatric hospitals.

PATIENTS

The first third (369) of long stay psychiatric patients to be resettled.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Reasons for patients being readmitted to hospital and not leaving the patients' service needs.

RESULTS

22--6% of both hospitals' long stay patients--were not successfully resettled in the community. Eighteen continuing care places per 100,000 of catchment area population seem to be required for this group. Patients whose placements were unsuccessful were usually readmitted because of a deterioration of their mental state and aggressive behaviour, both of which persisted and necessitated their continuing stay in hospital, often in a locked ward. Risk factors associated with failure were a high level of psychosis; a diagnosis of paranoid psychosis; incontinence; and being male. But having a social network, especially a large one, seemed to aid successful placement in the community.

CONCLUSION

Rehabilitation efforts should be focused on the characteristics of these patients that put them at risk of failing to succeed in community placements.

摘要

目的

确定作为两家精神病院关闭计划一部分而无法在社区重新安置的患者,并确定其数量及安置失败的风险因素。

设计与背景

对弗里恩和克莱伯里精神病院关闭情况的前瞻性研究。

患者

首批需重新安置的长期住院精神病患者中的三分之一(369名)。

观察指标

患者再次入院的原因以及未满足的患者服务需求。

结果

两家医院长期住院患者中有22.6%未能成功在社区重新安置。该群体似乎每10万集水区人口需要18个持续护理床位。安置不成功的患者通常因精神状态恶化和攻击性行为而再次入院,这两种情况持续存在,使得他们常常需要继续住院,且通常住在封闭病房。与安置失败相关的风险因素包括精神病程度高、偏执型精神病诊断、大小便失禁和男性。但拥有社交网络,尤其是大型社交网络,似乎有助于在社区成功安置。

结论

康复工作应聚焦于这些使患者面临社区安置失败风险的特征。