Suppr超能文献

新西兰全科医疗中吸入性糖皮质激素的差异化处方

Differential prescribing of inhaled corticosteroids in New Zealand general practice.

作者信息

Hall Jason, Penrose Alister, Tomlin Andrew, Reid James

机构信息

Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners Research Unit, Department of General Practice, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

出版信息

N Z Med J. 2003 Aug 22;116(1180):U563.

Abstract

AIM

To determine how inhaled budesonide, beclomethasone and fluticasone are prescribed by general practitioners in New Zealand.

METHODS

Retrospective study of computerised clinical records from 42 general practices in New Zealand for the period 1 July 1997 to 30 June 1998. The study population comprised 174 929 consulting patients, of whom 9878 patients were prescribed budesonide, fluticasone, or beclomethasone with full dosing instructions.

RESULTS

The mean daily prescribed dose was higher for patients receiving inhaled budesonide (886 microg) than beclomethasone (547 microg), a difference of 339 microg (95% CI 311 microg to 367 microg), and fluticasone (508 microg), a difference of 378 microg (95% CI 344-412). The difference between mean daily prescribed doses of beclomethasone and fluticasone was 39 microg (95% CI 15-63). The overall difference was consistent across age groups and with different types of inhalation device. Evidence of systematic prescribing of higher doses of budesonide to patients with more severe asthma was not found. Patients prescribed fluticasone were more likely to have been prescribed oral steroids in the preceding year.

CONCLUSIONS

Conclusions about the relative potencies of inhaled corticosteroids cannot be made with the data presented. However, data presented show that inhaled corticosteroids have not been prescribed in line with their reported relative potencies. This study provides benchmark data for the prescribing of inhaled steroids in New Zealand general practice.

摘要

目的

确定新西兰全科医生如何开具吸入用布地奈德、倍氯米松和氟替卡松的处方。

方法

对新西兰42家全科诊所1997年7月1日至1998年6月30日期间的计算机化临床记录进行回顾性研究。研究人群包括174929名就诊患者,其中9878名患者被开具了布地奈德、氟替卡松或倍氯米松的处方,并附有完整的用药说明。

结果

接受吸入用布地奈德治疗的患者平均每日处方剂量(886微克)高于倍氯米松(547微克),相差339微克(95%置信区间为311微克至367微克),也高于氟替卡松(508微克),相差378微克(95%置信区间为344 - 412)。倍氯米松和氟替卡松的平均每日处方剂量之差为39微克(95%置信区间为15 - 63)。各年龄组以及不同类型吸入装置的总体差异一致。未发现有向哮喘更严重患者系统性开具更高剂量布地奈德的证据。开具氟替卡松处方的患者在前一年更有可能被开具口服类固醇药物。

结论

根据所提供的数据无法得出关于吸入性糖皮质激素相对效力的结论。然而,所提供的数据表明,吸入性糖皮质激素的处方开具与所报道的相对效力不一致。本研究为新西兰全科医疗中吸入性类固醇的处方开具提供了基准数据。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验