Dubin Anne M, Berul Charles I, Bevilacqua Laura M, Collins Kathryn K, Etheridge Susan P, Fenrich Arnold L, Friedman Richard A, Hamilton Robert M, Schaffer Michael S, Shah Maully, Silka Michael J, Van Hare George F, Kertesz Naomi J
Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Stanford University, 750 Welch Road, Suite 305, Palo Alto, CA 94303, USA.
J Card Fail. 2003 Oct;9(5):375-9. doi: 10.1054/s1071-9164(03)00128-3.
This multicenter study evaluated experience with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) as a bridge to orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) in children.
The application of ICD therapy continues to expand in pediatric populations, due in part to improved technology and new indications, including the prevention of sudden death while awaiting OHT.
We performed a retrospective review of ICD databases at 9 pediatric transplant centers.
Twenty-eight patients (16 males) underwent implantation or had a preexisting ICD while awaiting OHT between 1990 and 2002. The median age at implant was 14.3 years (11 months to 21 years) with a median weight of 49 kg (11.7-88 kg). Diagnoses included cardiomyopathy (n=22), and congenital heart disease (n=6). Indications for ICD implantation included ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (n=23), syncope (n=5), aborted sudden death with no documentation of rhythm disturbance (n=5), ventricular ectopy (n=1), and poor function (n=5). Of the 28 ICDs, 23 were implanted by a transvenous approach and 5 by epicardial route. There were 55 defibrillator discharges in 17 patients, 47 (85%) of which (in 13 patients) were appropriate. The 8 inappropriate discharges (in 6 patients) were triggered by sinus tachycardia, inappropriate sensing, and atrial flutter. The mean time from implantation to first appropriate shock was 6.9 months (1 day to 2.6 years). Twenty-one patients underwent transplantation during the study period, whereas 2 died while awaiting a donor. Morbidity included a lead fracture, 3 episodes of electromechanical dissociation, and 1 episode of electrical storm.
ICD implantation represents an effective bridge to transplantation in pediatric patients. The complication rate is low, with inappropriate device discharge due primarily to sinus tachycardia or atrial flutter. There is a high incidence of appropriate ICD therapy for malignant ventricular arrhythmias in this highly selected group of patients.
这项多中心研究评估了植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)作为儿童原位心脏移植(OHT)桥梁的应用经验。
ICD治疗在儿科人群中的应用持续扩大,部分原因是技术改进和新的适应症,包括在等待OHT期间预防猝死。
我们对9个儿科移植中心的ICD数据库进行了回顾性研究。
1990年至2002年间,28例患者(16例男性)在等待OHT期间接受了ICD植入或已预先植入ICD。植入时的中位年龄为14.3岁(11个月至21岁),中位体重为49千克(11.7 - 88千克)。诊断包括心肌病(n = 22)和先天性心脏病(n = 6)。ICD植入的适应症包括室性心动过速/心室颤动(n = 23)、晕厥(n = 5)、无节律紊乱记录的心脏骤停(n = 5)、室性早搏(n = 1)和心功能不全(n = 5)。28台ICD中,23台通过静脉途径植入,5台通过心外膜途径植入。17例患者发生了55次除颤器放电,其中47次(85%)(在13例患者中)是恰当的。8次不恰当放电(在6例患者中)由窦性心动过速、感知异常和心房扑动触发。从植入到首次恰当电击的平均时间为6.9个月(1天至2.6年)。21例患者在研究期间接受了移植,2例在等待供体时死亡。并发症包括1次导线断裂、3次电机械分离发作和1次电风暴发作。
ICD植入是儿科患者移植的有效桥梁。并发症发生率低,不恰当的设备放电主要由窦性心动过速或心房扑动引起。在这一高度选择的患者群体中,ICD对恶性室性心律失常的恰当治疗发生率很高。