Mabanta C G, Pryhuber G S, Weinberg G A, Phelps D L
Pediatrics-Neonatology, Strong Children's Research Center, University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Avenue Box 651, Rochester, New York 14642, USA.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(4):CD003744. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003744.
Controversy exists over whether or not Ureaplasma urealyticum colonization or infection of the respiratory tract contributes to the severity of chronic lung disease (CLD), a major cause of morbidity and mortality in preterm infants.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of prophylactic or therapeutic erythromycin in preventing chronic lung disease in intubated preterm infants with unknown U. urealyticum status or proven positivity.
Searches were done of MEDLINE (1966-June 9, 2003), EMBASE (1980-May 5, 2003), The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2002), previous reviews including cross-references, and abstracts of conference proceedings (Pediatric Academic Societies 2000-2003, American Thoracic Society 2001-2003). There were no language restrictions. Expert informants were contacted.
Randomized or quasi-randomized studies comparing either prophylactic or therapeutic administration of oral or intravenous erythromycin (regardless of dose and duration) versus no treatment or placebo among intubated preterm infants <37 weeks and <2500 grams with either unknown U. urealyticum status or proven positivity by culture or polymerase chain reaction.
Data were extracted by all of the authors independently and differences were resolved by consensus. Treatment effects for categorical outcomes were expressed as relative risk, with 95% confidence intervals.
Two small controlled studies, both involving intubated babies <30 weeks gestation, were eligible for inclusion. Lyon 1998 tested prophylactic erythromycin in babies whose U. urealyticum status was unknown at the time of initiation of treatment. Jonsson 1998 tested erythromycin in babies known to be culture positive for U. urealyticum. Neither trial showed a statistically significant effect of erythromycin on CLD, death or the combined outcome CLD or death. Because the two studies differed importantly in their design, the results were not combined in meta-analyses. No adverse effects of a 7-10 day course of erythromycin were reported in either study.
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence does not demonstrate a reduction in CLD/death when intubated preterm infants are treated with erythromycin prophylactically before U. urealyticum culture/PCR results are known or when Ureaplasma colonized, intubated preterm infants are treated with erythromycin. However, a true benefit could easily have been missed with the small sample sizes in the two eligible studies. The studies were greatly underpowered to detect uncommon adverse effects such as pyloric stenosis. Additional controlled trials are required to determine whether antibiotic therapy of Ureaplasma reduces CLD and/or death in intubated preterm infants.
解脲脲原体在呼吸道的定植或感染是否会加重慢性肺病(CLD),这一早产儿发病和死亡的主要原因,目前仍存在争议。
评估预防性或治疗性使用红霉素对预防插管的解脲脲原体状态未知或已证实为阳性的早产儿慢性肺病的有效性和安全性。
检索了MEDLINE(1966年 - 2003年6月9日)、EMBASE(1980年 - 2003年5月5日)、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL,Cochrane图书馆,2002年第4期)、既往综述(包括交叉参考文献)以及会议论文摘要(2000 - 2003年儿科学术协会、2001 - 2003年美国胸科学会)。无语言限制。还联系了专家提供信息者。
比较口服或静脉注射红霉素(无论剂量和疗程)预防性或治疗性给药与未治疗或安慰剂在孕周小于37周、体重小于2500克且解脲脲原体状态未知或经培养或聚合酶链反应证实为阳性的插管早产儿中的随机或半随机研究。
所有作者独立提取数据,分歧通过协商解决。分类结局的治疗效果以相对风险表示,并伴有95%置信区间。
两项小型对照研究符合纳入标准,均涉及孕周小于30周的插管婴儿。Lyon 1998对治疗开始时解脲脲原体状态未知的婴儿进行了预防性红霉素试验。Jonsson 1998对已知解脲脲原体培养阳性的婴儿进行了红霉素试验。两项试验均未显示红霉素对CLD、死亡或CLD或死亡的综合结局有统计学显著影响。由于两项研究设计差异很大,结果未合并进行荟萃分析。两项研究均未报告7 - 10天疗程的红霉素有不良反应。
目前的证据表明,在解脲脲原体培养/PCR结果未知之前对插管早产儿进行预防性红霉素治疗,或对解脲脲原体定植的插管早产儿进行红霉素治疗,并未降低CLD/死亡发生率。然而,两项符合条件研究的样本量较小,很可能遗漏了真正的益处。这些研究检测罕见不良反应(如幽门狭窄)的能力严重不足。需要更多对照试验来确定解脲脲原体的抗生素治疗是否能降低插管早产儿的CLD和/或死亡发生率。