Ford A, Delaney B, Forman D, Moayyedi P
Centre for Digestive Diseases, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George Street, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK, LS1 3EX.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(4):CD003840. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003840.
BACKGROUND: Peptic ulcer disease is the cause for dyspepsia in about 10% of patients. 95% of duodenal and 70% of gastric ulcers are associated with Helicobacter pylori. Eradication of H pylori reduces the relapse rate of ulcers but the magnitude of this effect is uncertain. OBJECTIVES: The primary outcomes were the proportion of peptic ulcers healed initially and proportion of patients free from relapse following successful healing. Eradication therapy was compared to placebo or pharmacological therapies in H. pylori positive patients. Secondary aims included symptom relief and adverse effects. SEARCH STRATEGY: A search was undertaken according to the Cochrane Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Diseases Review Group module using CCTR, MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases. Experts in the field and pharmaceutical companies were contacted. Abstract books between 1994 and 2002 were hand-searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of short and long-term treatment of peptic ulcer disease in H. pylori positive adults were analysed. Patients received at least one week of H pylori eradication compared with ulcer healing drug, placebo or not treatment. Trials were included if they reported assessment from 2 weeks onwards. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were collected on ulcer healing, recurrence, relief of symptoms and adverse effects. MAIN RESULTS: 59 trials were eligible. Data extraction was not possible in 7 trials, and 52 trials were included. In duodenal ulcer healing, eradication therapy was superior to ulcer healing drug (UHD) (34 trials, 3910 patients, relative risk [RR] of ulcer persisting = 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.58, 0.76) and no treatment (2 trials, 207 patients, RR = 0.37; 95% CI 0.26, 0.53). In gastric ulcer healing, no significant differences were detected between eradication therapy and UHD (13 trials, 1469 patients, RR = 1.32; 95% CI = 0.92, 1.90). In preventing duodenal ulcer recurrence no significant differences were detected between eradication therapy and maintenance therapy with UHD (4 trials, 319 patients, relative risk [RR] of ulcer recurring = 0.73; 95% CI = 0.42, 1.25), but eradication therapy was superior to no treatment (26 trials 2434 patients, RR = 0.19; 95% CI = 0.15, 0.26). In preventing gastric ulcer recurrence, eradication therapy was superior to no treatment (9 trials, 774 patients, RR = 0.31; 95% CI 0.19, 0.48). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: A 1 to 2 weeks course of H. pylori eradication therapy is an effective treatment for H. pylori positive peptic ulcer disease.
背景:消化性溃疡病是约10%患者消化不良的病因。95%的十二指肠溃疡和70%的胃溃疡与幽门螺杆菌有关。根除幽门螺杆菌可降低溃疡复发率,但这种效果的程度尚不确定。 目的:主要结局是消化性溃疡最初愈合的比例以及成功愈合后无复发的患者比例。在幽门螺杆菌阳性患者中,将根除治疗与安慰剂或药物治疗进行比较。次要目标包括症状缓解和不良反应。 检索策略:根据Cochrane上消化道和胰腺疾病综述小组模块,使用CCTR、MEDLINE、EMBASE和CINAHL数据库进行检索。联系了该领域的专家和制药公司。手工检索了1994年至2002年的摘要书籍。 入选标准:分析了幽门螺杆菌阳性成年人消化性溃疡病短期和长期治疗的随机对照试验。与溃疡愈合药物、安慰剂或不治疗相比,患者接受了至少一周的幽门螺杆菌根除治疗。如果试验报告了从2周起的评估,则纳入试验。 数据收集与分析:收集了关于溃疡愈合、复发、症状缓解和不良反应的数据。 主要结果:59项试验符合条件。7项试验无法进行数据提取,纳入了52项试验。在十二指肠溃疡愈合方面,根除治疗优于溃疡愈合药物(UHD)(34项试验,3910例患者,溃疡持续存在的相对风险[RR]=0.66;95%置信区间[CI]=0.58,0.76)和不治疗(2项试验,207例患者,RR=0.37;95%CI 0.26,0.53)。在胃溃疡愈合方面,根除治疗与UHD之间未检测到显著差异(13项试验,1469例患者,RR=1.32;95%CI=0.92,1.90)。在预防十二指肠溃疡复发方面,根除治疗与UHD维持治疗之间未检测到显著差异(4项试验,319例患者,溃疡复发的相对风险[RR]=0.73;95%CI=0.42,1.25),但根除治疗优于不治疗(26项试验,2434例患者,RR=0.19;95%CI=0.15,0.26)。在预防胃溃疡复发方面,根除治疗优于不治疗(9项试验,774例患者,RR=0.31;95%CI 0.19,0.48)。 综述作者结论:1至2周疗程的幽门螺杆菌根除治疗是幽门螺杆菌阳性消化性溃疡病的有效治疗方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004-10-18
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006-4-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-4-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003
Vaccines (Basel). 2025-7-3
Biomolecules. 2024-6-28
PLoS One. 2007-12-26
BMJ. 2006-1-28