McClay E F, Albright K D, Jones J A, Eastman A, Christen R, Howell S B
Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla 92093.
Cancer Res. 1992 Dec 15;52(24):6790-6.
Previous studies have shown that the combination of dacarbazine, carmustine, cisplatin (DDP), and tamoxifen (TAM) produced a 53% overall response rate in patients with disseminated melanoma. Deletion of TAM from the regimen resulted in a fall in the response rate to 10%, and reincorporation of TAM returned the response rate to 52%, suggesting an important role for TAM. Using the human melanoma cell line T-289, we examined the nature of the interaction between TAM and each member of this combination in clonogenic assays in soft agar. The combination of TAM with DDP was highly synergistic as demonstrated by median effect analysis, whereas TAM was antagonistic with carmustine and an activated form of dacarbazine. The mean combination index at 50% kill was 0.26 +/- 0.02 (mean +/- SD) for TAM and DDP. This marked synergism was observed at concentrations of TAM that are clinically achievable. TAM had no effect on the uptake of the DDP analogue [3H]dichloro(ethylenediamine)platinum(II). There was no effect on the formation or repair of DDP intrastrand DNA adducts. Similarly, there was no effect demonstrated on the intracellular concentrations of glutathione or metallothioneins. We conclude that the interaction between TAM and DDP is truly synergistic in this cell line and is accomplished through none of the four mechanisms commonly associated with DDP resistance.
