Suppr超能文献

一种用于桥接研究评估的序贯组设计方法。

A group sequential approach to evaluation of bridging studies.

作者信息

Hsiao Chin-Fu, Xu Jia-Zhen, Liu Jen-Pei

机构信息

Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, National Health Research Institutes, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Biopharm Stat. 2003 Nov;13(4):793-801. doi: 10.1081/BIP-120024210.

Abstract

The International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) E5 guideline defines a bridging study as a supplementary study conducted in the new region to provide pharmacodynamic or clinical data on efficacy, safety, dosage, and dose regimen to allow extrapolation of the foreign clinical data to the population of the new region. Therefore, a bridging study is usually conducted in the new region only after the test product has been approved for commercial marketing in the original region due to its proven efficacy and safety. The issue of analysis of clinical data generated by the bridging study conducted in the new region to evaluate the similarity for extrapolation of the foreign clinical data to the population of the new region is the information on efficacy, safety, dosage, and dose regimen of the original region that cannot be concurrently obtained from the local bridging studies but is available in the trials conducted in the original region. A group sequential approach is therefore proposed to overcome the issue of internal validity. In particular, we use the region as a group sequence to enroll the patients from the original region first and then to enroll patients from the new region subsequently. Methods for sample size determination for the bridging study in the new region are also proposed.

摘要

国际协调会议(ICH)E5指南将桥接研究定义为在新地区开展的补充性研究,旨在提供有关疗效、安全性、剂量和给药方案的药效学或临床数据,以便将国外临床数据外推至新地区人群。因此,通常只有在试验产品因其已证实的疗效和安全性在原地区获得商业销售批准后,才会在新地区开展桥接研究。在新地区开展桥接研究以评估将国外临床数据外推至新地区人群的相似性时,对所产生临床数据进行分析的问题在于,原地区的疗效、安全性、剂量和给药方案信息无法从当地桥接研究中同时获取,但可在原地区进行的试验中获得。因此,提出了一种成组序贯方法来解决内部有效性问题。具体而言,我们将地区作为一个组序列,先纳入来自原地区的患者,随后再纳入来自新地区的患者。还提出了新地区桥接研究样本量确定的方法。

相似文献

1
A group sequential approach to evaluation of bridging studies.
J Biopharm Stat. 2003 Nov;13(4):793-801. doi: 10.1081/BIP-120024210.
2
Use of prior information for Bayesian evaluation of bridging studies.
J Biopharm Stat. 2007;17(1):109-21. doi: 10.1080/10543400601001501.
3
A Bayesian noninferiority approach to evaluation of bridging studies.
J Biopharm Stat. 2004 May;14(2):291-300. doi: 10.1081/BIP-120037180.
4
A consistency approach to evaluation of bridging studies and multi-regional trials.
Stat Med. 2011 Jul 30;30(17):2171-86. doi: 10.1002/sim.4251. Epub 2011 May 17.
5
A two-stage design for bridging studies.
J Biopharm Stat. 2005;15(1):75-83. doi: 10.1081/bip-200040836.
6
Sample size determination for a specific region in a multiregional trial.
J Biopharm Stat. 2010 Jul;20(4):870-85. doi: 10.1080/10543401003618900.
7
Bayesian approach to evaluation of bridging studies.
J Biopharm Stat. 2002 Aug;12(3):401-8. doi: 10.1081/bip-120014568.
8
Weighted evidence approach of bridging study.
J Biopharm Stat. 2012 Sep;22(5):952-65. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2012.701580.
9
Statistical methods for bridging studies.
J Biopharm Stat. 2012 Sep;22(5):903-15. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2012.701578.
10
Bridging bioequivalence studies.
J Biopharm Stat. 2004 Nov;14(4):857-67. doi: 10.1081/BIP-200035418.

引用本文的文献

1
Innovation drug approvals based on a bridging study: from concept to practice.
Transl Breast Cancer Res. 2022 Jan 31;3:2. doi: 10.21037/tbcr-21-43. eCollection 2022.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验