Suppr超能文献

抗逆转录病毒疗法中的蛋白质结合

Protein binding in antiretroviral therapies.

作者信息

Boffito Marta, Back David J, Blaschke Terrence F, Rowland Malcolm, Bertz Richard J, Gerber John G, Miller Veronica

机构信息

St. Stephens Centre, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London SW10 9NH, United Kingdom.

出版信息

AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2003 Sep;19(9):825-35. doi: 10.1089/088922203769232629.

Abstract

There is marked variability in the extent to which the three classes of antiretroviral (ARV) drugs bind to plasma proteins (<5 to >99%). Protease inhibitors (PIs), with the exception of indinavir, are more than 90% protein bound, mainly to alpha1-acid glycoprotein (AAG). Efavirenz, a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), is more than 99% bound, mainly to albumin. Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) are not highly protein bound. The pharmacological activity of ARV drugs is dependent on unbound drug entering cells that harbor the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). There has been concern that changes in protein binding could impact on antiviral activity and management. However, for PIs and NNRTIs, and for many drugs given orally, altered plasma binding would not be expected to influence the average exposure to unbound (active) drug after chronic oral dosing. Nevertheless, there will be a change in the relationship between total and unbound concentrations that will be important if, as part of therapeutic drug monitoring, the total rather than the unbound drug is measured. Measuring drug concentrations that are needed to inhibit different HIV strains (wild type and drug resistant) in vitro could also cause confusion because most methods employ bovine serum in the assay medium, and unbound concentrations are not directly measured. Estimating unbound drug concentrations in human plasma and in incubation media can be highly method dependent and thus may affect the calculated IC50 (the concentration of drug that results in 50% inhibition of viral replication). Because inhibitory quotients (IQs = C(trough)/IC50) are becoming part of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analyses of clinical trial data, the strengths and weaknesses of the methods used for the determination of unbound drug concentration in plasma and in vitro systems--ultracentrifugation, ultrafiltration, and equilibrium dialysis--need to be understood. Consensus on standard procedures must be reached. In June 2002, a panel of experts assembled by the Forum for Collaborative HIV Research met in Washington, DC, to review the basic principles of protein binding of ARV drugs, and to discuss the impact that changes in plasma protein binding may have on the PKs and activity of ARV drugs as well as on therapeutic drug monitoring. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the following topics: (1) basic principles of protein binding and how changes in binding can impact on drug PKs and drug exposure in vivo, (2) variability in plasma protein binding among patients taking ARV drugs, (3) the impact of HIV infection and concomitant diseases on the extent of plasma protein binding, (4) the likelihood of clinically relevant drug interactions at the level of plasma protein binding, (5) the evidence that measuring unbound concentrations of ARV drugs in the plasma of patients gives more meaningful information than total drug concentration and, therefore, should be considered in routine therapeutic drug monitoring of ARV agents, (6) optimal method(s) for measuring the unbound concentration of drugs in vitro (for IC50 determination) and in vivo, and (7) future studies that need to be considered to fully understand the importance of plasma protein binding in therapeutic drug monitoring. This report summarizes the topics discussed at this meeting. It guides the reader through the discussions that allowed the panel to formulate a series of statements regarding the significance of plasma protein binding of ARV drugs when studied in vitro and in vivo. The roundtable participants also identified research priorities that are important for understanding the sources of inter- and intraindividual variability in protein binding in patients. These include obtaining data on unbound as well as on total concentrations in PK studies; looking at variants of AAG and whether they differ in binding affinity; and emphasizing the importance of developing a standard procedure for drug susceptibility assays used to determine IC50 values.

摘要

三类抗逆转录病毒(ARV)药物与血浆蛋白的结合程度存在显著差异(<5%至>99%)。除茚地那韦外,蛋白酶抑制剂(PI)与蛋白的结合率超过90%,主要与α1-酸性糖蛋白(AAG)结合。非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂(NNRTI)依非韦伦与蛋白的结合率超过99%,主要与白蛋白结合。核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂(NRTI)与蛋白的结合率不高。ARV药物的药理活性取决于未结合药物进入携带人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)的细胞。人们担心蛋白结合的变化可能会影响抗病毒活性和治疗管理。然而,对于PI和NNRTI,以及许多口服药物,慢性口服给药后血浆结合的改变预计不会影响未结合(活性)药物的平均暴露量。尽管如此,如果在治疗药物监测中测量的是总药物而非未结合药物,那么总浓度与未结合浓度之间的关系将会发生变化,这一点很重要。在体外测量抑制不同HIV毒株(野生型和耐药型)所需的药物浓度也可能会造成混淆,因为大多数方法在测定介质中使用牛血清,且未直接测量未结合浓度。估计人血浆和孵育介质中的未结合药物浓度高度依赖方法,因此可能会影响计算出的IC50(导致病毒复制被抑制50%的药物浓度)。由于抑制商(IQs = C(谷浓度)/IC50)正成为临床试验数据的药代动力学/药效学(PK/PD)分析的一部分,因此需要了解用于测定血浆和体外系统中未结合药物浓度的方法——超速离心、超滤和平衡透析——的优缺点。必须就标准程序达成共识。2002年6月,由艾滋病合作研究论坛召集的一个专家小组在华盛顿特区开会,审查ARV药物蛋白结合的基本原理,并讨论血浆蛋白结合变化可能对ARV药物的药代动力学、活性以及治疗药物监测产生的影响。会议的目的是讨论以下主题:(1)蛋白结合的基本原理以及结合变化如何影响药物的药代动力学和体内药物暴露,(2)服用ARV药物患者的血浆蛋白结合变异性,(3)HIV感染和伴随疾病对血浆蛋白结合程度的影响,(4)血浆蛋白结合水平上临床相关药物相互作用的可能性,(5)有证据表明在患者血浆中测量ARV药物的未结合浓度比总药物浓度能提供更有意义的信息,因此在ARV药物的常规治疗药物监测中应予以考虑,(6)体外(用于测定IC50)和体内测量药物未结合浓度的最佳方法,以及(7)为充分理解血浆蛋白结合在治疗药物监测中的重要性而需要考虑的未来研究。本报告总结了本次会议讨论的主题。它引导读者了解相关讨论内容,这些讨论使专家小组能够就ARV药物在体外和体内研究时血浆蛋白结合的意义形成一系列声明。圆桌会议参与者还确定了研究重点,这些重点对于理解患者蛋白结合的个体间和个体内变异性来源很重要。这些重点包括在药代动力学研究中获取未结合浓度以及总浓度的数据;研究AAG的变体及其结合亲和力是否不同;强调制定用于确定IC50值的药物敏感性测定标准程序的重要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验