Stephens J, Laskin B, Pashos C, Peña B, Wong J
Abt Associates Clinical Trials, HERQuLES Group, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2003 Nov;42 Suppl 3:iii40-52. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keg497.
Pain has been recognized as a problem of global proportions, and postoperative pain is one of the most common types of pain. Postoperative pain is acute and, although it is preventable and/or treatable, it is often undertreated. Lack of appropriate analgesic management has significant impact on clinical and economic outcomes. Negative clinical outcomes of inadequately managed acute postoperative pain include extended hospitalization, compromised prognosis, higher morbidity and mortality, and the development of a chronic pain state as a result of neuronal plasticity. Although estimating the economic burden of postoperative pain is difficult, this burden is considerable and results from direct costs due to excess health-care resource use, as well as indirect costs due to reduced patient functionality and productivity. These latter factors also have a significant adverse impact on patients' quality of life and may be associated with the development of depression and anxiety. Thus, improved clinical outcomes are dependent not only on the availability of effective drugs but also on their appropriate utilization. A multimodal approach incorporating different drugs and techniques is effective in reducing postoperative pain but is limited by the currently available therapies. The efficacy of opioids is well established, but there are concerns about dependency, respiratory depression and side-effects, which patients often find intolerable. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are effective as adjunctive medication in a multimodal regimen but are associated with side-effects, such as platelet dysfunction and renal and gastrointestinal toxicity, that have special clinical significance in patients undergoing surgical procedures. Cyclooxygenase-2-specific inhibitors such as celecoxib, rofecoxib and valdecoxib, were developed to provide the efficacy of non-specific NSAIDs while limiting associated toxicity. These agents have demonstrated analgesic efficacy and an opioid-sparing effect in a variety of surgical procedures, suggesting their value as an alternative to non-specific NSAIDs. Further studies are needed to determine the impact of these drugs on clinical and economic outcomes when used in a programme of postsurgical pain management.
疼痛已被公认为是一个全球性问题,术后疼痛是最常见的疼痛类型之一。术后疼痛是急性的,尽管它是可预防和/或可治疗的,但往往治疗不足。缺乏适当的镇痛管理对临床和经济结果有重大影响。急性术后疼痛管理不当的负面临床结果包括住院时间延长、预后受损、发病率和死亡率升高,以及由于神经元可塑性导致慢性疼痛状态的发展。虽然估计术后疼痛的经济负担很困难,但这一负担相当大,源于因过度使用医疗资源产生的直接成本,以及因患者功能和生产力下降产生的间接成本。后一类因素也对患者的生活质量有重大不利影响,可能与抑郁和焦虑的发生有关。因此,改善临床结果不仅取决于有效药物的可用性,还取决于它们的适当使用。采用不同药物和技术的多模式方法在减轻术后疼痛方面是有效的,但受到目前可用疗法的限制。阿片类药物的疗效已得到充分证实,但人们担心其依赖性、呼吸抑制和副作用,患者往往难以忍受。非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)作为多模式治疗方案中的辅助药物是有效的,但会产生副作用,如血小板功能障碍以及对接受手术的患者具有特殊临床意义的肾毒性和胃肠道毒性。开发了环氧化酶-2特异性抑制剂,如塞来昔布、罗非昔布和伐地昔布,以提供非特异性NSAIDs的疗效,同时限制相关毒性。这些药物在各种外科手术中已显示出镇痛效果和阿片类药物节省效应,表明它们可作为非特异性NSAIDs的替代品。需要进一步研究以确定这些药物在用于术后疼痛管理方案时对临床和经济结果的影响。