Kim AeRi, Dean Ann
Laboratory of Cellular and Developmental Biology, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Building 50, 50 South Drive, MSC 8028, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Mol Cell Biol. 2003 Nov;23(22):8099-109. doi: 10.1128/MCB.23.22.8099-8109.2003.
Gene activation requires alteration of chromatin structure to facilitate active transcription complex formation at a gene promoter. Nucleosome remodeling complexes and histone modifying complexes each play unique and interdependent roles in bringing about these changes. The role of distant enhancers in these structural alterations is not well understood. We studied nucleosome remodeling and covalent histone modification mediated by the beta-globin locus control region HS2 enhancer at nucleosome-level resolution throughout a 5.5-kb globin gene model locus in vivo in K562 cells. We compared the transcriptionally active locus to one in which HS2 was inactivated by mutations in the core NF-E2 sites. In contrast to inactive templates, nucleosomes were mobilized in discrete areas of the active locus, including the HS2 core and the proximal promoter. Large differences in restriction enzyme accessibility between the active and inactive templates were limited to the regions of nucleosome mobilization, which subsumed the DNase I hypersensitive sites. In contrast to this discrete pattern, histone H3 and H4 acetylation and H3 K4 methylation were elevated across the entire active locus, accompanied by depletion of linker histone H1. The coding region of the gene differed from the regulatory regions, demonstrating both nucleosome mobilization and histone hyperacetylation, but lacked differences in restriction enzyme accessibility between transcriptionally active and inactive genes. Thus, although the histone modification pattern we observe is consistent with the spreading of histone modifying activity from the distant enhancer, the pattern of nucleosome mobilization is more compatible with direct contact between an enhancer and promoter.
基因激活需要染色质结构的改变,以促进基因启动子处活性转录复合物的形成。核小体重塑复合物和组蛋白修饰复合物在引发这些变化中各自发挥独特且相互依存的作用。远距离增强子在这些结构改变中的作用尚不清楚。我们在体内K562细胞中,以核小体水平分辨率研究了由β-珠蛋白基因座控制区HS2增强子介导的核小体重塑和共价组蛋白修饰,该研究涉及一个5.5kb的珠蛋白基因模型基因座。我们将转录活性基因座与一个HS2因核心NF-E2位点突变而失活的基因座进行了比较。与非活性模板不同,核小体在活性基因座的离散区域被动员,包括HS2核心和近端启动子。活性模板与非活性模板之间限制酶可及性的巨大差异仅限于核小体动员区域,该区域包含DNase I超敏位点。与这种离散模式不同,组蛋白H3和H4乙酰化以及H3 K4甲基化在整个活性基因座上均升高,同时连接组蛋白H1减少。基因的编码区与调控区不同,显示出核小体动员和组蛋白超乙酰化,但转录活性基因与非活性基因之间在限制酶可及性上没有差异。因此,尽管我们观察到的组蛋白修饰模式与组蛋白修饰活性从远距离增强子扩散一致,但核小体动员模式更符合增强子与启动子之间的直接接触。