Schaffer Randolph L, Kulkarni Sanjay, Harper Ann, Millis J Michael, Cronin David C
Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Liver Transpl. 2003 Nov;9(11):1211-5. doi: 10.1053/jlts.2003.50192.
February 27, 2002, allocation of cadaver livers for transplantation changed from a waiting-time-based system to an evidence-based system referred to as the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD). We reviewed data from 1 of the 11 United Network for Organ Sharing regions to determine the impact of the MELD on the allocation of cadaver livers for transplantation in that region. The region of interest (study region) consists of three distinct geographic areas (referred to as Transplant Service Areas [TSAs]). Based on information obtained from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network for the United States and for the study region, the following observations were made: (1) study region patients who received a cadaver liver had higher mean and median MELD scores than cadaver liver recipients in the United States (study region mean score, 25.1; median, 26.0; US mean score, 23.9; median, 24.0); (2) within the study region, TSAs with competing liver transplant programs performed transplantation on patients at a significantly higher mean MELD score than TSAs dominated by a single center (TSA-1 mean score, 27.3; TSA-2 mean score, 26.6; TSA-3 mean score, 21.3); this disparity persisted when transplantations for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were excluded; and (3) study region patients removed from the waiting list because of death or being too sick for transplantation have higher MELD scores than the national average (study region mean score, 25.4; US mean score, 23.8). Overall, implementation of the MELD resulted in a substantial increase in the number of transplantations performed for HCC, and MELD exceptions for all reasons were more common in TSAs that have multiple centers. Despite the MELD, there remains disparity in organ allocation within the study region. The MELD may accurately predict pretransplantation mortality, but it does not ensure equitable organ distribution. We propose that intraregional sharing of cadaver livers based on the MELD may help limit disparities in organ allocation.
2002年2月27日,尸体肝脏移植的分配系统从基于等待时间的系统转变为基于证据的系统,即终末期肝病模型(MELD)。我们回顾了器官共享联合网络11个区域中1个区域的数据,以确定MELD对该区域尸体肝脏移植分配的影响。感兴趣的区域(研究区域)由三个不同的地理区域组成(称为移植服务区[TSA])。根据从美国器官获取与移植网络以及研究区域获得的信息,得出以下观察结果:(1)接受尸体肝脏移植的研究区域患者的MELD平均得分和中位数高于美国尸体肝脏移植受者(研究区域平均得分25.1;中位数26.0;美国平均得分23.9;中位数24.0);(2)在研究区域内,有竞争性肝脏移植项目的TSA对患者进行移植时的平均MELD得分显著高于由单一中心主导的TSA(TSA-1平均得分27.3;TSA-2平均得分26.6;TSA-3平均得分21.3);排除肝细胞癌(HCC)移植后,这种差异仍然存在;(3)因死亡或病情过重而被从等待名单中除名的研究区域患者的MELD得分高于全国平均水平(研究区域平均得分25.4;美国平均得分23.8)。总体而言,MELD的实施导致HCC移植数量大幅增加,并且由于各种原因的MELD例外情况在有多个中心的TSA中更为常见。尽管有MELD,但研究区域内的器官分配仍存在差异。MELD可能准确预测移植前死亡率,但它并不能确保器官的公平分配。我们建议基于MELD的区域内尸体肝脏共享可能有助于限制器官分配的差异。