• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

县社会经济特征与儿科肾移植结局。

County socioeconomic characteristics and pediatric renal transplantation outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Drive, Columbus, OH, 43205, USA.

Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Nephrol. 2018 Jul;33(7):1227-1234. doi: 10.1007/s00467-018-3928-0. Epub 2018 Mar 12.

DOI:10.1007/s00467-018-3928-0
PMID:29532229
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6425941/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Existing risk adjustment models for solid organ transplantation omit socioeconomic status (SES). With limited data available on transplant candidates' SES, linkage of transplant outcomes data to geographic SES measures has been proposed. We investigate the utility of county SES for understanding differences in pediatric kidney transplantation (KTx) outcomes.

METHODS

We identified patients < 18 years of age receiving first-time KTx using United Network for Organ Sharing registry data in two eras: 2006-2010 and 2011-2015, corresponding to periods of county SES data collection. In each era, counties were ranked by 1-year rates of survival with intact graft, and by county SES score. We used Spearman correlation (ρ) to evaluate the association between county rankings on SES and transplant outcomes in each era and consistency between these measures across eras. We also evaluated the utility of county SES for improving prediction of individual KTx outcomes.

RESULTS

The analysis included 2972 children and 108 counties. County SES and transplant outcomes were not correlated in either 2006-2010 (ρ = 0.06; p = 0.525) or 2011-2015 (ρ = 0.162, p = 0.093). County SES rankings were strongly correlated between eras (ρ = 0.99, p < 0.001), whereas county rankings of transplant outcomes were not correlated between eras (ρ = 0.16, p = 0.097). Including county SES quintile in individual-level models of transplant outcomes did not improve model predictive utility.

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric kidney transplant outcomes are unstable from period to period at the county level and are not correlated with county-level SES. Appropriate adjustment for SES disparities in transplant outcomes could require further collection of detailed individual SES data.

摘要

背景

现有的实体器官移植风险调整模型忽略了社会经济地位(SES)。由于可供移植候选人 SES 数据有限,因此提出了将移植结果数据与地理 SES 度量值进行链接。我们研究了县 SES 对理解儿科肾移植(KTx)结果差异的作用。

方法

我们使用 United Network for Organ Sharing 登记数据,在两个时期内确定了年龄均<18 岁的首次接受 KTx 的患者:2006-2010 年和 2011-2015 年,分别对应于县 SES 数据收集时期。在每个时期,根据 1 年存活率和完整移植物以及县 SES 评分对县进行排名。我们使用 Spearman 相关系数(ρ)来评估 SES 县排名与每个时期的移植结果之间的相关性以及这些措施在各时期之间的一致性。我们还评估了县 SES 对改善个体 KTx 结果预测的作用。

结果

分析共纳入了 2972 名儿童和 108 个县。在 2006-2010 年(ρ=0.06;p=0.525)或 2011-2015 年(ρ=0.162,p=0.093)期间,县 SES 和移植结果均不相关。两个时期的县 SES 排名高度相关(ρ=0.99,p<0.001),而两个时期的移植结果的县排名不相关(ρ=0.16,p=0.097)。在个体移植结果模型中包含县 SES 五分位数并不能提高模型的预测能力。

结论

儿科肾移植结果在县一级随时间变化而不稳定,与县一级 SES 无关。要适当调整移植结果中的 SES 差异,可能需要进一步收集详细的个人 SES 数据。

相似文献

1
County socioeconomic characteristics and pediatric renal transplantation outcomes.县社会经济特征与儿科肾移植结局。
Pediatr Nephrol. 2018 Jul;33(7):1227-1234. doi: 10.1007/s00467-018-3928-0. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
2
County Rankings Have Limited Utility When Predicting Liver Transplant Outcomes.县级排名在预测肝移植结果方面的作用有限。
Dig Dis Sci. 2020 Jan;65(1):104-110. doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05734-z. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
3
The impact of socioeconomic status and geographic remoteness on access to pre-emptive kidney transplantation and transplant outcomes among children.社会经济地位和地理位置偏远对儿童获得抢先肾移植及移植结局的影响。
Pediatr Nephrol. 2016 Jun;31(6):1011-9. doi: 10.1007/s00467-015-3279-z. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
4
County socioeconomic characteristics and heart transplant outcomes in the United States.美国各县的社会经济特征与心脏移植结果
Am Heart J. 2017 Aug;190:104-112. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.05.013. Epub 2017 Jun 3.
5
Socioeconomic Disparities in Adherence and Outcomes After Heart Transplant: A UNOS (United Network for Organ Sharing) Registry Analysis.社会经济差异对心脏移植后依从性和结局的影响:美国器官共享联合网络(UNOS)登记分析。
Circ Heart Fail. 2018 Mar;11(3):e004173. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.117.004173.
6
Racial Disparities in Access to and Outcomes of Kidney Transplantation in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults: Results From the ESPN/ERA-EDTA (European Society of Pediatric Nephrology/European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association) Registry.儿童、青少年和青年人群肾移植的机会和结果中的种族差异:来自 ESPN/ERA-EDTA(欧洲儿科学会肾脏病学分会/欧洲肾脏协会-欧洲透析和移植协会)注册研究的结果。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2016 Feb;67(2):293-301. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.09.023. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
7
Poor outcomes for children on the wait list at low-volume kidney transplant centers in the United States.美国低移植量肾脏移植中心等待名单上儿童的不良预后。
Pediatr Nephrol. 2017 Apr;32(4):669-678. doi: 10.1007/s00467-016-3519-x. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
8
Factors that influence access to the national renal transplant waiting list.影响进入全国肾移植等候名单的因素。
Transplantation. 2009 Jul 15;88(1):96-102. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181aa901a.
9
Racial disparities in pediatric access to kidney transplantation: does socioeconomic status play a role?儿童接受肾移植的种族差异:社会经济地位是否起作用?
Am J Transplant. 2012 Feb;12(2):369-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03888.x. Epub 2012 Jan 6.
10
A2 to B Kidney Transplantation in the Post-Kidney Allocation System Era: A 3-year Experience with Anti-A Titers, Outcomes, and Cost.抗 A 抗体、结局和费用:后肾脏分配体系时代 A2 至 B 型肾移植的 3 年经验
J Am Coll Surg. 2019 Apr;228(4):635-641. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.12.023. Epub 2019 Jan 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing Community-Level Social Determinants of Health With Patient Race in Total Hip Arthroplasty Outcomes.在全髋关节置换术结果中比较社区层面的健康社会决定因素与患者种族。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2025 Jul;77(7):892-899. doi: 10.1002/acr.25511. Epub 2025 Mar 21.
2
Neighborhood Socioeconomic Deprivation is Associated with Worse Outcomes in Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients.社区社会经济剥夺与小儿肾移植受者的不良预后相关。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2024 Oct 31;20(2):277-88. doi: 10.2215/CJN.0000000592.
3
Predictors of academic delay post-pediatric kidney transplant in the USA.

本文引用的文献

1
Pediatric kidney transplantation and mortality: Distance to transplant center matters.小儿肾移植与死亡率:与移植中心的距离至关重要。
Pediatr Transplant. 2018 Mar;22(2). doi: 10.1111/petr.13120. Epub 2018 Jan 7.
2
Resident Documentation of Social Determinants of Health: Effects of a Teaching Tool in the Outpatient Setting.住院医师对健康社会决定因素的记录:门诊环境中一种教学工具的效果
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2018 Apr;57(4):451-456. doi: 10.1177/0009922817728697. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
3
County socioeconomic characteristics and heart transplant outcomes in the United States.
美国儿科肾移植后学业延迟的预测因素。
Pediatr Nephrol. 2024 Nov;39(11):3309-3316. doi: 10.1007/s00467-024-06445-y. Epub 2024 Jul 4.
4
Assessing the Impact of Neighborhood and Built Environment on Pediatric Perioperative Care: A Systematic Review of the Literature.评估邻里和建筑环境对儿科围手术期护理的影响:文献系统评价。
J Pediatr Surg. 2024 Jul;59(7):1378-1387. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.03.033. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
5
The unfinished journey toward transplant equity: an analysis of racial/ethnic disparities for children after the implementation of the Kidney Allocation System in 2014.迈向移植公平的未竟之旅:2014 年实施肾脏分配系统后,儿童的种族/民族差异分析。
Pediatr Nephrol. 2023 Apr;38(4):1275-1289. doi: 10.1007/s00467-022-05676-1. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
6
Are Income-based Differences in TKA Use and Outcomes Reduced in a Single-payer System? A Large-database Comparison of the United States and Canada.按收入划分的 TKA 使用和结果差异在单一支付者制度下是否减少?美国和加拿大的大型数据库比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Sep 1;480(9):1636-1645. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002207. Epub 2022 May 9.
7
Paediatric kidney transplantation in under-resourced regions-a panoramic view.资源匮乏地区的儿科肾脏移植——全景观察。
Pediatr Nephrol. 2022 Apr;37(4):745-755. doi: 10.1007/s00467-021-05070-3. Epub 2021 Apr 10.
8
Policy in pediatric nephrology: successes, failures, and the impact on disparities.儿科肾脏病学政策:成功、失败及其对差异的影响。
Pediatr Nephrol. 2021 Aug;36(8):2177-2188. doi: 10.1007/s00467-020-04755-5. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
9
County Rankings Have Limited Utility When Predicting Liver Transplant Outcomes.县级排名在预测肝移植结果方面的作用有限。
Dig Dis Sci. 2020 Jan;65(1):104-110. doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05734-z. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
美国各县的社会经济特征与心脏移植结果
Am Heart J. 2017 Aug;190:104-112. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.05.013. Epub 2017 Jun 3.
4
OPTN/SRTR 2015 Annual Data Report: Kidney.器官获取与移植网络/器官共享联合网络2015年度数据报告:肾脏
Am J Transplant. 2017 Jan;17 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):21-116. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14124.
5
OPTN/SRTR 2015 Annual Data Report: Lung.器官获取与移植网络/器官共享联合网络2015年度数据报告:肺脏
Am J Transplant. 2017 Jan;17 Suppl 1:357-424. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14129.
6
Socioeconomic Deprivation and Survival After Heart Transplantation in England: An Analysis of the United Kingdom Transplant Registry.英国心脏移植后的社会经济剥夺与生存情况:对英国移植登记处的分析
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016 Nov;9(6):695-703. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.002652. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
7
Utility of Ecological Risk Factors for Evaluation of Transplant Center Performance.用于评估移植中心绩效的生态风险因素的效用
Am J Transplant. 2017 Mar;17(3):617-621. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14074. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
8
Health Insurance Trajectories and Long-Term Survival After Heart Transplantation.心脏移植后的健康保险轨迹与长期生存
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016 Sep;9(5):576-84. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003067. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
9
Insurance status by region at the time of heart transplantation: Implications for survival.心脏移植时按地区划分的保险状况:对生存的影响。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016 Dec;35(12):1480-1486. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2016.06.012. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
10
Implications of expanded medicaid eligibility for patient outcomes after liver transplantation: Caveat emptor.
Liver Transpl. 2016 Aug;22(8):1062-4. doi: 10.1002/lt.24491.