Legemaate J
Koninklijke Nederlandsche Maatschappij tot bevordering der Geneeskunst (KNMG), Postbus 20.051, 3502 LB Utrecht.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2003 Oct 11;147(41):1995-7.
Should the present legal regulation of medical negligence be replaced by a no-fault compensation system (NFCS)? The Dutch government is preparing a viewpoint on this issue on the basis of a research report that describes the pros and cons of a NFCS. Recently, the British chief medical officer (CMO) rejected the introduction of a comprehensive NFCS. Instead, the CMO proposed to introduce other reforms to mitigate the disadvantages of the present system of medical litigation. A NFCS has certain advantages but is supposedly very expensive. Other policy measures can be considered as well.
现行关于医疗过失的法律规定是否应由无过错赔偿制度(NFCS)取代?荷兰政府正基于一份描述无过错赔偿制度利弊的研究报告,就该问题拟定一份观点报告。最近,英国首席医疗官(CMO)拒绝引入全面的无过错赔偿制度。相反,首席医疗官提议进行其他改革,以减轻现行医疗诉讼制度的弊端。无过错赔偿制度有一定优势,但据说成本很高。也可以考虑其他政策措施。