Suppr超能文献

["无过错" 赔偿制度的优缺点]

[Advantages and disadvantages of a "no-fault" compensation system].

作者信息

Legemaate J

机构信息

Koninklijke Nederlandsche Maatschappij tot bevordering der Geneeskunst (KNMG), Postbus 20.051, 3502 LB Utrecht.

出版信息

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2003 Oct 11;147(41):1995-7.

Abstract

Should the present legal regulation of medical negligence be replaced by a no-fault compensation system (NFCS)? The Dutch government is preparing a viewpoint on this issue on the basis of a research report that describes the pros and cons of a NFCS. Recently, the British chief medical officer (CMO) rejected the introduction of a comprehensive NFCS. Instead, the CMO proposed to introduce other reforms to mitigate the disadvantages of the present system of medical litigation. A NFCS has certain advantages but is supposedly very expensive. Other policy measures can be considered as well.

摘要

现行关于医疗过失的法律规定是否应由无过错赔偿制度(NFCS)取代?荷兰政府正基于一份描述无过错赔偿制度利弊的研究报告,就该问题拟定一份观点报告。最近,英国首席医疗官(CMO)拒绝引入全面的无过错赔偿制度。相反,首席医疗官提议进行其他改革,以减轻现行医疗诉讼制度的弊端。无过错赔偿制度有一定优势,但据说成本很高。也可以考虑其他政策措施。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验