• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双价性是有代价的:双价刺激会引发谨慎的反应。

Bivalency is costly: bivalent stimuli elicit cautious responding.

作者信息

Woodward Todd S, Meier Beat, Tipper Christine, Graf Peter

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

Exp Psychol. 2003;50(4):233-8. doi: 10.1026//1618-3169.50.4.233.

DOI:10.1026//1618-3169.50.4.233
PMID:14587170
Abstract

When performing tasks in alternation, substantial slowing occurs when the stimuli have features relevant to both tasks (i.e., when stimuli are bivalent as opposed to univalent). One possible source of this slowing, herein called a bivalency cost, is that encountering bivalent stimuli leads to a more cautious response style. To investigate this, we employed a paradigm that required performing three simple tasks, with bivalent stimuli occasionally encountered on one task. The results show that regardless of the feature overlap among the stimuli used for the different tasks, the introduction of bivalent stimuli slowed responding on all tasks and it was accompanied by a decrease in response errors. Overall, it appears that bivalent stimuli recruit a more cautious approach to task-switching performance.

摘要

当交替执行任务时,如果刺激具有与两个任务都相关的特征(即,与单值刺激相对,刺激是双值的),就会出现明显的反应减慢。这种减慢的一个可能来源,在此称为双值代价,是遇到双值刺激会导致更谨慎的反应方式。为了对此进行研究,我们采用了一种范式,该范式要求执行三个简单任务,其中在一个任务上偶尔会遇到双值刺激。结果表明,无论用于不同任务的刺激之间的特征重叠如何,双值刺激的引入都会减慢所有任务的反应速度,并且伴随着反应错误的减少。总体而言,似乎双值刺激会促使在任务切换表现中采用更谨慎的方法。

相似文献

1
Bivalency is costly: bivalent stimuli elicit cautious responding.双价性是有代价的:双价刺激会引发谨慎的反应。
Exp Psychol. 2003;50(4):233-8. doi: 10.1026//1618-3169.50.4.233.
2
The bivalency effect in task switching: general and enduring.任务切换中的双价效应:普遍且持久。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2009 Sep;63(3):201-10. doi: 10.1037/a0014311.
3
An orienting response is not enough: Bivalency not infrequency causes the bivalency effect.仅仅有定向反应是不够的:二元性而非频率导致了二元性效应。
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2013 Sep 20;9(3):146-55. doi: 10.2478/v10053-008-0142-9. eCollection 2013.
4
The bivalency effect in task switching: event-related potentials.任务转换中的双重效应:事件相关电位。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2013 May;34(5):999-1012. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21488. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
5
Episodic context binding in task switching: evidence from amnesia.任务转换中的情景上下文绑定:来自遗忘症的证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2013 Apr;51(5):886-92. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.01.025. Epub 2013 Feb 5.
6
The bivalency effect: evidence for flexible adjustment of cognitive control.二价效应:认知控制灵活调整的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Feb;38(1):213-21. doi: 10.1037/a0026024. Epub 2011 Nov 7.
7
Post-conflict slowing after incongruent stimuli: from general to conflict-specific.冲突后不一致刺激下的反应减慢:从一般情况到特定冲突情况
Psychol Res. 2017 May;81(3):611-628. doi: 10.1007/s00426-016-0767-0. Epub 2016 Mar 28.
8
Age affects the adjustment of cognitive control after a conflict: evidence from the bivalency effect.年龄对冲突后认知控制的调整有影响:来自双价效应的证据。
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2015;22(1):72-94. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2014.889070. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
9
The bivalency effect represents an interference-triggered adjustment of cognitive control: an ERP study.双价效应代表一种由干扰触发的认知控制调整:一项 ERP 研究。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2013 Sep;13(3):575-83. doi: 10.3758/s13415-013-0160-z.
10
More conflict does not trigger more adjustment of cognitive control for subsequent events: a study of the bivalency effect.更多冲突并不会引发对后续事件认知控制的更多调整:双价效应研究。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Jan;145:111-7. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.11.005. Epub 2013 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Task-Specific Modulation of Cognitive Control: Electrophysiological Evidence From Bivalency Effect in Task Switching.认知控制的任务特定调制:来自任务切换中二元性效应的电生理证据。
Psych J. 2025 Jun;14(3):417-427. doi: 10.1002/pchj.70011. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
2
Predictive alternating runs and random task-switching sequences produce dissociative switch costs in the Consonant-Vowel/Odd-Even task.在辅音-元音/奇偶任务中,预测性交替序列和随机任务切换序列会产生分离性切换成本。
Cogn Process. 2025 Feb;26(1):157-170. doi: 10.1007/s10339-024-01236-7. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
3
Local and global control adjustments to stimulus-based task conflict in task switching.
任务切换中基于刺激的任务冲突的局部和全局控制调整。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2025 May;78(5):963-977. doi: 10.1177/17470218231200442. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
4
Attentional attenuation (rather than attentional boost) through task switching leads to a selective long-term memory decline.通过任务切换导致的注意力衰减(而非注意力增强)会导致选择性的长期记忆衰退。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 20;13:1027871. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1027871. eCollection 2022.
5
The Multifaceted Nature of Bilingualism and Attention.双语能力与注意力的多面性
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 3;13:910382. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.910382. eCollection 2022.
6
Age-related qualitative differences in post-error cognitive control adjustments.年龄相关的错误后认知控制调整的定性差异。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2022 Jun;40(2):287-305. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12403. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
7
Effects of aging in a task-switch paradigm with the diffusion decision model.任务转换范式中扩散决策模型的老化效应。
Psychol Aging. 2020 Sep;35(6):850-865. doi: 10.1037/pag0000562. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
8
Different impact of task switching and response-category conflict on subsequent memory.任务转换和反应类别冲突对后续记忆的不同影响。
Psychol Res. 2021 Mar;85(2):679-696. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01274-3. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
9
The SwAD-Task - An Innovative Paradigm for Measuring Costs of Switching Between Different Attentional Demands.SwAD任务——一种用于测量在不同注意力需求之间切换成本的创新范式。
Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 4;10:2178. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02178. eCollection 2019.
10
Exploring the Limitations of the Shielding Function of Categorization Rules in Task-Switching.探索分类规则在任务切换中的屏蔽功能局限性
Front Psychol. 2019 May 28;10:1212. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01212. eCollection 2019.