Standardization of hysterosalpingography and selective salpingography: a valuable adjunct to simple opacification studies.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the correlation between opacification and perfusion pressures during hysterosalpingography (HSG) and selective salpingography under the assumption that the latter may add to the diagnostic capabilities of the procedures.

DESIGN

Perfusion pressures were uniformly evaluated by standardizing injection volume per time interval of contrast medium and the delivery system. Pressures were measured in a closed system through a digital manometer and recorded on tracing paper.

SETTING

Fully ambulatory gynecoradiology suite at academically affiliated infertility center.

PATIENTS

Thirty infertility patients.

INTERVENTION

Hysterosalpingography and selective salpingography for diagnostic purposes.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Correlation between opacification patterns and perfusion pressures.

RESULTS

The evaluation of perfusion pressures during HSG is unreliable because they may be affected by uterine factors and will only reflect the oviduct of least resistance. In contrast, perfusion pressures during selective salpingography are reflective of only the investigated tube. They appear to lie within a functionally normal range of up to 350 mm Hg. Tubes by opacification judged as normal exhibited a pressure range of 429 +/- 376 mm Hg, which was significantly lower than that of abnormally appearing oviducts (957 +/- 445 mm Hg; P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The concomitant performance of perfusion pressure studies during selective salpingography further enhances the diagnostic capability of selective salpingography over HSG in the diagnostic evaluation of fallopian tubes.