Yugué I, Shiba K, Uezaki N
Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique, Spinal Injuries Center, 550-4 Igisu, Iizuka, Fukuoka, Japon.
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2003 Oct;89(6):487-95.
Cervical laminoplasty has been widely used in Japan as the treatment of progressive cervical myelopathy. However, in 1993, Guigui reported that extensive cervical laminectomy was enough for the treatment of cervical myelopathy secondary to stenotic conditions. The purpose of this report was to compare the results of extensive laminectomy as reported by Guigui in 1998 with those of laminoplasty in our series using exactly the same criteria for anatomic analysis.
Thirty patients aged over 40 years who underwent a spinous process splitting laminoplasty using a threadwire saw from C3 to C7 without fusion for cervical spondylotic myelopathy were reviewed retrospectively with an average follow-up of 3.7 years. Functional results were evaluated according to the Japanese Orthopedic Association scoring system for cervical myelopathy. Lateral views in the neutral position, in flexion, and in extension of the preoperative cervical roentgenograms were analyzed in comparison with the last follow-up films in order to identify the change in the curvature of the cervical alignment, in the range of neck motion, in the intervertebral angular mobility, and in the anteroposterior displacement of the vertebral bodies, and finally to identify the incidence of spinal instability. These data were compared with those of extensive laminectomy published by Guigui.
Seven patients (23%) developed postoperative changes in cervical spine curvature. Only one patient had a new destabilized level postoperatively. No patient required new surgery. Compared with the results obtained after extensive cervical laminectomy, incidence of new destabilized level or aggravated level was statistically lower after laminoplasty than after laminectomy.
Spinous process splitting laminoplasty causes an ossification between the remaining spinous process and an unexpected fusion of the lateral mass. These results may prevent postoperative segmental destabilization.
颈椎椎板成形术在日本已被广泛用于治疗进展性颈椎病脊髓病。然而,1993年,吉吉报告称广泛颈椎椎板切除术足以治疗狭窄性颈椎病脊髓病。本报告的目的是使用完全相同的解剖学分析标准,比较吉吉在1998年报告的广泛椎板切除术结果与我们系列中椎板成形术的结果。
回顾性分析30例年龄超过40岁、因颈椎病脊髓病接受从C3至C7使用线锯进行棘突劈开椎板成形术且未融合的患者,平均随访3.7年。根据日本骨科协会颈椎病脊髓病评分系统评估功能结果。将术前颈椎X线片在中立位、屈曲位和伸展位的侧位片与最后一次随访片进行分析比较,以确定颈椎排列的曲度变化、颈部活动范围、椎间角活动度以及椎体的前后移位,最终确定脊柱不稳定的发生率。将这些数据与吉吉发表的广泛椎板切除术的数据进行比较。
7例患者(23%)术后出现颈椎曲度变化。仅1例患者术后有新的不稳定节段。无患者需要再次手术。与广泛颈椎椎板切除术后的结果相比,椎板成形术后新的不稳定节段或加重节段的发生率在统计学上低于椎板切除术后。
棘突劈开椎板成形术会导致剩余棘突之间形成骨化以及侧块意外融合。这些结果可能会防止术后节段性不稳定。