Piazza Cathleen C, Patel Meeta R, Gulotta Charles S, Sevin Bari M, Layer Stacy A
Marcus Institute, 1920 Briarcliff Road, Atlanta, Georgia 30329, USA.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2003 Fall;36(3):309-24. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2003.36-309.
We compared the effects of positive reinforcement alone, escape extinction alone, and positive reinforcement with escape extinction in the treatment of the food and fluid refusal of 4 children who had been diagnosed with a pediatric feeding disorder. Consumption did not increase when positive reinforcement was implemented alone. By contrast, consumption increased for all participants when escape extinction was implemented, independent of the presence or absence of positive reinforcement. However, the addition of positive reinforcement to escape extinction was associated with beneficial effects (e.g., greater decreases in negative vocalizations and inappropriate behavior) for some participants.
我们比较了单独使用正强化、单独使用逃避消退以及正强化与逃避消退相结合这三种方法,对4名被诊断患有小儿喂养障碍的儿童食物和液体拒绝行为的治疗效果。单独实施正强化时,进食量并未增加。相比之下,实施逃避消退时,所有参与者的进食量都增加了,无论是否存在正强化。然而,对一些参与者来说,在逃避消退基础上增加正强化会产生有益效果(如负面发声和不当行为的减少更为明显)。