Jacobs Rowena, Dawson Diane
Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK.
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2003 Oct;8(4):202-8. doi: 10.1258/135581903322403263.
In England, the Department of Health places high priority on reducing the variation in unit costs of National Health Service (NHS) hospitals. Efficiency targets are set for hospitals to create incentives for relatively high cost hospitals to reduce their costs and shift performance closer to that of their lower cost counterparts. We examine empirically the dispersion in unit costs to assess the extent of variation in the productivity of hospitals and trends over time.
We use econometric panel data techniques on data from 235 NHS acute hospital trusts over a six-year period, 1994/95 to 1999/00, supplemented with information from semi-structured interviews with key individuals in hospitals and purchasing bodies.
There appears to have been no reduction in variation during this period. Relative unit costs for individual trusts also appear stable, with little movement from relatively high cost to low cost. Judging from limited quantitative evidence outside health care, the variation in costs between NHS hospitals may be comparatively low.
Given all the other aspects of hospital performance that government is seeking to change, reduction in the dispersion of unit costs per se should not be a major policy objective. It is far more important to examine variation in quality-adjusted unit costs.
在英国,卫生部高度重视降低国民医疗服务体系(NHS)医院单位成本的差异。为医院设定了效率目标,以激励成本相对较高的医院降低成本,并使绩效更接近成本较低的同行。我们通过实证研究单位成本的离散程度,以评估医院生产率的差异程度及其随时间的变化趋势。
我们运用计量经济学面板数据技术,对1994/95至1999/00这六年期间235个NHS急症医院信托的数据进行分析,并辅以对医院和采购机构关键人员的半结构化访谈信息。
在此期间,差异似乎并未减少。各信托的相对单位成本也似乎保持稳定,从高成本到低成本的变动很小。从医疗保健领域以外有限的定量证据来看,NHS医院之间的成本差异可能相对较低。
鉴于政府试图改变医院绩效的所有其他方面,单位成本差异本身的减少不应成为主要政策目标。研究质量调整后的单位成本差异更为重要。