Suppr超能文献

[通过弗明汉原始函数和REGICOR校准函数估算的人群冠心病风险比较]

[Comparison of population coronary heart disease risk estimated by the Framingham original and REGICOR calibrated functions].

作者信息

Ramos Rafael, Solanas Pascual, Cordón Ferran, Rohlfs Izabella, Elosua Roberto, Sala Joan, Masiá Rafael, Faixedas María Teresa, Marrugat Jaume

机构信息

Equipo de Atención Primaria Salt. Servicio de Atención Primaria Gironès Sud-La Selva. Unidad Docente de Medicina de Familia. Institut Català de la Salut. Girona. Spain.

出版信息

Med Clin (Barc). 2003 Oct 25;121(14):521-6. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7753(03)74007-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The therapeutic consequences of using the Framingham function calibrated by the REGICOR and Framingham investigators (Framingham-REGICOR) in the Spanish population are unknown. The objective of this study was to determine the differences in the classification of the population coronary risk when using the classical Framingham function (Framingham-Wilson) and that calibrated, and its consequences on the theoretical indication of lipid-lowering treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

The classification into the < 2%, 2-4,9%, 5-9,9%, 10-19,9%, 20-39,9%, and >= 40% risk categories observed by the two functions was compared in 3.270 individuals aged 35 to 74 years with no history of ischaemic heart disease or lipid-lowering drug treatment, recruited in two population samples representative of Girona between 1994 and 2001. The number of lipid-lowering treatment candidates was estimated applying the most recent guidelines for clinical practice, according to the risk level obtained with both functions.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients excluded owing to the fact that they already were on lipid-lowering treatment was 6.2%. The Framingham-REGICOR assigned 54.2% of women and 67.9% of men to a lower level of risk as compared to the Framingham-Wilson function. In 0.2% of women and 21.2% of men the decrease was two categories of risk. The figures in diabetic participants were 75.7 and 18.5%, respectively. When the European recommendations published in 2003 were applied, lipid-lowering treatment would have been indicated in 14.5% and in 4.4% of non-diabetic participants by the Framingham-Wilson and the Framingham-REGICOR, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The calibrated Framingham-REGICOR function assigns a lower coronary risk category in more than 50% of women and almost 90% of men than the uncalibrated Framingham function. The calibrated function is more suitable for risk estimation in primary prevention than the original function in Spain.

摘要

背景与目的

在西班牙人群中使用由REGICOR和弗雷明汉研究人员校准的弗雷明汉函数(弗雷明汉 - REGICOR)的治疗效果尚不清楚。本研究的目的是确定使用经典弗雷明汉函数(弗雷明汉 - 威尔逊)和校准后的函数时人群冠心病风险分类的差异,以及其对降脂治疗理论指征的影响。

患者与方法

在1994年至2001年间招募的3270名年龄在35至74岁、无缺血性心脏病史或降脂药物治疗史的个体中,比较了这两种函数将其分为<2%、2 - 4.9%、5 - 9.9%、10 - 19.9%、20 - 39.9%和≥40%风险类别的情况。这3270名个体来自代表赫罗纳的两个人群样本。根据两种函数得出的风险水平,应用最新临床实践指南估算降脂治疗候选者的数量。

结果

因已接受降脂治疗而被排除的患者比例为6.2%。与弗雷明汉 - 威尔逊函数相比,弗雷明汉 - REGICOR将54.2%的女性和67.9%的男性归为较低风险水平。在0.2%的女性和21.2%的男性中,风险降低了两个类别。糖尿病参与者中的这一数字分别为75.7%和18.5%。当应用2003年发布的欧洲建议时,弗雷明汉 - 威尔逊函数和弗雷明汉 - REGICOR分别显示,非糖尿病参与者中14.5%和4.4%的人应接受降脂治疗。

结论

与未校准的弗雷明汉函数相比,校准后的弗雷明汉 - REGICOR函数将超过50%的女性和近90%的男性归为较低的冠心病风险类别。在校准函数在西班牙比原始函数更适合用于一级预防中的风险评估。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验