• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

物体与事件的个体化:一项发展性研究。

Individuation of objects and events: a developmental study.

作者信息

Wagner Laura, Carey Susan

机构信息

Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA.

出版信息

Cognition. 2003 Dec;90(2):163-91. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(03)00143-4.

DOI:10.1016/s0010-0277(03)00143-4
PMID:14599752
Abstract

This study investigates children's ability to use language to guide their choice of individuation criterion in the domains of objects and events. Previous work (Shipley, E. F., & Shepperson, B. (1990). Countable entities: developmental changes. Cognition, 34, 109-136.) has shown that children have a strong bias to use a spatio-temporal individuation strategy when counting objects and that children will ignore a conflicting linguistic description in favor of this spatio-temporal bias. Experiment 1 asked children (3-, 4-, and 5-year-olds) and adults to count objects and events under different linguistic descriptions. In the object task, subjects counted pictures of familiar objects split into multiple pieces (as in Shipley, E. F., & Shepperson, B. (1990). Countable entities: developmental changes. Cognition, 34, 109-136.) and described either using an appropriate kind label (e.g. "car") or the general term "thing". In the event task, subjects watched short animated movies consisting of a goal-oriented event achieved via multiple, temporally separated steps. The events were described either with an appropriate telic predicate targeting the goal (e.g. "paint a flower") or with an atelic predicate targeting the steps in the process (e.g. "paint") and the subjects' task was to count the events. Relative to adults, children preferred a spatio-temporal counting strategy in both tasks; there was no difference among the three groups of children. However, children were able to significantly change their counting strategy to follow the linguistic description in the event but not the object task. Experiment 2 extended the object task to include counting of other types of non-spatio-temporal units such as sub-parts of objects and collections. Results showed that children could use the linguistic descriptions to guide their counting strategy for these new items, though they continued to show a bias for a spatio-temporal individuation strategy with the collections. We suggest potential cognitive origins for the spatio-temporal individuation bias and how it interacts with children's developing linguistic knowledge.

摘要

本研究调查儿童运用语言来指导其在物体和事件领域中个体化标准选择的能力。先前的研究(希普利,E.F.,& 谢泼森,B.(1990)。可数实体:发展变化。《认知》,34,109 - 136)表明,儿童在数物体时强烈倾向于使用时空个体化策略,并且儿童会忽视与之冲突的语言描述而倾向于这种时空偏向。实验1要求儿童(3岁、4岁和5岁)及成人在不同语言描述下对数物体和事件进行计数。在物体任务中,受试者对数张被分成多块的熟悉物体图片(如希普利,E.F.,& 谢泼森,B.(1990)。可数实体:发展变化。《认知》,34,109 - 136中所示)进行计数,并使用合适的类别标签(如“汽车”)或通用术语“东西”来描述。在事件任务中,受试者观看简短的动画电影,这些电影由通过多个时间上分开的步骤实现的目标导向事件组成。事件要么用针对目标的合适的有终点谓词(如“画一朵花”)来描述,要么用针对过程中步骤的无终点谓词(如“画”)来描述,受试者的任务是对事件进行计数。相对于成人,儿童在两项任务中都更倾向于时空计数策略;三组儿童之间没有差异。然而,儿童能够显著改变其计数策略以遵循事件任务中的语言描述,但在物体任务中却不能。实验2扩展了物体任务,包括对其他类型的非时空单位进行计数,如物体的子部分和集合。结果表明,儿童能够运用语言描述来指导他们对这些新项目的计数策略,尽管他们在对集合进行计数时仍然表现出对时空个体化策略的偏向。我们提出了时空个体化偏向的潜在认知根源,以及它如何与儿童不断发展的语言知识相互作用。

相似文献

1
Individuation of objects and events: a developmental study.物体与事件的个体化:一项发展性研究。
Cognition. 2003 Dec;90(2):163-91. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(03)00143-4.
2
Sortal concepts and pragmatic inference in children's early quantification of objects.儿童对物体早期量化中的分类概念和语用推理
Cogn Psychol. 2013 May;66(3):302-26. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2013.01.003. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
3
Events and objects are similar cognitive entities.事件和物体是相似的认知实体。
Cogn Psychol. 2023 Jun;143:101573. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2023.101573. Epub 2023 May 11.
4
Countable entities: developmental changes.可数实体:发育变化
Cognition. 1990 Feb;34(2):109-36. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(90)90041-h.
5
Children's questions: a mechanism for cognitive development.儿童的问题:一种认知发展机制。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2007;72(1):vii-ix, 1-112; discussion 113-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5834.2007.00412.x.
6
Piecing together numerical language: children's use of default units in early counting and quantification.拼凑数字语言:儿童在早期计数和量化中的默认单位使用。
Dev Sci. 2011 Jan;14(1):44-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00954.x.
7
How special are objects? Children's reasoning about objects, parts, and holes.
Psychol Sci. 2000 Nov;11(6):497-501. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00295.
8
Object individuation: infants' use of shape, size, pattern, and color.客体个体化:婴儿对形状、大小、图案和颜色的运用。
Cognition. 1999 Sep 30;72(2):125-66. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00035-9.
9
Object individuation and labelling in 6-month-old infants.6 个月大婴儿的客体识别与标记。
Infant Behav Dev. 2021 Nov;65:101627. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2021.101627. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
10
Children's understanding of counting.儿童对计数的理解。
Cognition. 1990 Aug;36(2):155-93. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(90)90003-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Portioning-Out and Individuation in Mandarin Non-interrogative -Pronominal Phrases: Experimental Evidence From Child Mandarin.汉语非疑问代词性短语中的成分划分与个体化:来自汉语儿童的实验证据
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 16;11:592281. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.592281. eCollection 2020.
2
Putting your money where your self is: Connecting dimensions of closeness and theories of personal identity.将你的钱放在你的自我所在之处:连接亲密的维度和个人认同理论。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 12;15(2):e0228271. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228271. eCollection 2020.
3
Word learning mechanisms.
词汇学习机制。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2017 Jul;8(4). doi: 10.1002/wcs.1435. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
4
Numerical morphology supports early number word learning: Evidence from a comparison of young Mandarin and English learners.数字形态学支持早期数字词学习:来自普通话和英语学习者比较的证据。
Cogn Psychol. 2016 Aug;88:162-86. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.06.003. Epub 2016 Jul 16.
5
What counts? Visual and verbal cues interact to influence what is considered a countable thing.什么才重要呢?视觉和语言线索相互作用,影响着什么被视为可数事物。
Mem Cognit. 2015 Jul;43(5):798-810. doi: 10.3758/s13421-015-0505-7.
6
The nature of thinking, shallow and deep.思维的本质,浅层次与深层次。
Front Psychol. 2014 May 15;5:435. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00435. eCollection 2014.
7
Connecting numbers to discrete quantification: a step in the child's construction of integer concepts.将数字与离散量化联系起来:儿童整数概念构建的一步。
Cognition. 2013 Oct;129(1):31-41. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.05.011. Epub 2013 Jul 3.
8
Learning that classifiers count: Mandarin-speaking children's acquisition of sortal and mensural classifiers.了解量词的重要性:说普通话儿童对类别量词和度量量词的习得
J East Asian Ling. 2010 Nov;19(3):207-230. doi: 10.1007/s10831-010-9060-1.
9
Inferring Meaning from Syntactic Structures in Acquisition: The Case of Transitivity and Telicity.习得过程中从句法结构推断意义:及物性和有界性的案例
Lang Cogn Process. 2010 Dec 1;25(10):1354-1379. doi: 10.1080/01690960903488375.
10
Twenty four-month-old infants' interpretations of novel verbs and nouns in dynamic scenes.24个月大婴儿对动态场景中新颖动词和名词的理解。
Cogn Psychol. 2009 Aug;59(1):67-95. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.02.001. Epub 2009 Mar 20.