Kerr Daniel P, Walsh Deirdre M, Baxter David
Rehabilatation Sciences Research Group, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Ulser at Jordanstown, County Antrim, Northern Ireland.
Clin J Pain. 2003 Nov-Dec;19(6):364-70. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200311000-00004.
To assess the efficacy of acupuncture in the treatment of chronic low back pain.
Patients (n = 60) with chronic low back pain were recruited and randomly allocated to either Acupuncture therapy or Placebo transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) groups. Patients were treated weekly for 6 weeks, and blinded assessments were carried out pre- and post-treatment using the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) and visual analog scales (VAS) for pain, the Short-form 36 quality-of-life questionnaire, and a simple range of motion measurement. A total of 46 patients completed the trial and were followed up at 6 months.
Analysis of results using t tests showed that in both groups there were significant pre-post improvements for all scores, except for MPQ scores in the Placebo-TENS group. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups for any of the outcome measures at the end of treatment. Results from the 6-month follow-up would suggest that the response was better in the acupuncture group.
Further research is necessary to fully assess the efficacy of this treatment in combating chronic low back pain using larger sample sizes or alternative control groups.
评估针刺治疗慢性下腰痛的疗效。
招募60例慢性下腰痛患者,随机分为针刺治疗组或安慰剂经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS)组。患者每周接受一次治疗,共治疗6周,治疗前后采用麦吉尔疼痛问卷(MPQ)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛程度、采用简短健康调查36项量表评估生活质量,并进行简单的活动范围测量,且评估过程采用盲法。共有46例患者完成试验,并在6个月时进行随访。
采用t检验分析结果显示,两组所有评分在治疗前后均有显著改善,但安慰剂TENS组的MPQ评分除外。治疗结束时,两组在任何一项结局指标上均无显著差异。6个月随访结果表明,针刺组的反应更好。
有必要开展进一步研究,采用更大样本量或替代对照组,以全面评估该治疗方法对抗慢性下腰痛的疗效。