Suppr超能文献

埋线针灸治疗慢性下腰痛的疗效与安全性:一项随机对照试验

Efficacy and safety of thread embedding acupuncture for chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled pilot trial.

作者信息

Lee Hyun-Jong, Choi Byung Il, Jun Seungah, Park Mu Seob, Oh Se Jung, Lee Jung Hee, Gong Han Mi, Kim Jae Soo, Lee Young Joon, Jung So-Young, Han Chang Hyun

机构信息

Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Daegu Haany University, Daegu, 42158, Republic of Korea.

Choibyungil 3S Korean medical clinic, Ulsan, 44726, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Trials. 2018 Dec 12;19(1):680. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3049-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We investigated the efficacy and safety of thread-embedding acupuncture (TEA) for chronic low back pain (LBP) in a randomized controlled pilot trial with the aim of laying the foundation for a large-scale randomized controlled trial on this topic.

METHODS

Forty participants were recruited for this two-arm, assessor-blinded randomized controlled pilot trial. The participants were randomly allocated to a TEA group (experimental group) or an acupuncture group (control group). The TEA group received TEA once every 2 weeks for 8 weeks (four sessions in total), while the acupuncture group received acupuncture twice per week for 8 weeks (16 sessions in total). The primary outcome was the visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain and the secondary outcomes were short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores. Assessments were performed at screening and at 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 weeks after treatment initiation (the 10-week assessment was conducted at 2 weeks after treatment cessation).

RESULTS

Of the 40 participants, 36 completed the study and four dropped out. Both the TEA group and the acupuncture group showed significant improvements in VAS, SF-MPQ, and ODI scores in a time-dependent manner. Furthermore, with regard to ODI, a significant interaction between group and time was observed, with the two groups exhibiting a different pattern of change at 8 weeks according to contrast analysis with Bonferroni's correction. No serious adverse event occurred, and hematological and biochemical test findings were within normal limits.

CONCLUSION

This pilot study has provided basic data for a larger clinical trial to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of TEA for chronic LBP.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Research Information Service of the Korea National Institute of Health, ID: KCT0001819 . Registered on 15 February 2016.

摘要

背景

我们在一项随机对照试验中研究了埋线针灸(TEA)治疗慢性下腰痛(LBP)的疗效和安全性,旨在为该主题的大规模随机对照试验奠定基础。

方法

本双臂、评估者盲法随机对照试验招募了40名参与者。参与者被随机分配到TEA组(实验组)或针刺组(对照组)。TEA组每2周接受一次TEA治疗,共8周(共4次治疗),而针刺组每周接受两次针刺治疗,共8周(共16次治疗)。主要结局是疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分,次要结局是简短麦吉尔疼痛问卷(SF-MPQ)和奥斯威斯功能障碍指数(ODI)评分。在筛查时以及治疗开始后2、4、6、8和10周进行评估(10周评估在治疗停止后2周进行)。

结果

40名参与者中,36名完成了研究,4名退出。TEA组和针刺组的VAS、SF-MPQ和ODI评分均随时间显著改善。此外,关于ODI,观察到组与时间之间存在显著交互作用,根据Bonferroni校正的对比分析,两组在8周时呈现出不同的变化模式。未发生严重不良事件,血液学和生化检查结果均在正常范围内。

结论

这项初步研究为更大规模的临床试验提供了基础数据,以证明TEA治疗慢性LBP的疗效和安全性。

试验注册

韩国国立卫生研究院临床研究信息服务中心,ID:KCT0001819。于2016年2月15日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ba4/6291972/4858f315c7ef/13063_2018_3049_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验