Odaka T, Nakayama A, Akazawa K, Sakamoto M, Kinukawa N, Kamakura T, Nishioka Y, Itasaka H, Watanabe Y, Nose Y
Department of Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Kyushu University.
J Med Syst. 1992 Aug;16(4):177-81. doi: 10.1007/BF00999380.
In literature database searching, we show that it is necessary to use plural databases for a more improved search. We also compare the results of a single database search with that of multiple database search in the domain of Japanese life sciences. We searched the MEDLINE and EMBASE using the same search terms. There were some differences in the results, owing to differences in the journals and recording methods. We herein show some of the differences in the journals contained in both databases. Furthermore, we show the differences in the number of papers derived from the same journal. Next, as an example of a practical search, we selected some universities in Japan, searched both databases regarding papers published from these universities and then merged the results by hand. According to our results, only 63% of all papers were common to both databases.
在文献数据库检索中,我们表明有必要使用多个数据库以实现更优的检索效果。我们还比较了日本生命科学领域单数据库检索与多数据库检索的结果。我们使用相同的检索词在MEDLINE和EMBASE中进行检索。由于期刊和记录方法的差异,结果存在一些不同。我们在此展示了两个数据库中所包含期刊的一些差异。此外,我们还展示了源自同一期刊的论文数量差异。接下来,作为实际检索的一个例子,我们选择了日本的一些大学,在两个数据库中检索这些大学发表的论文,然后手动合并结果。根据我们的结果,所有论文中只有63%在两个数据库中是共有的。