• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[关于血管内或硬膜外导管插入术前两种防腐剂溶液比较使用的文献综述]

[Critical review of the literature concerning the comparative use of two antiseptic solutions before intravascular or epidural catheterization].

作者信息

Clévenot D, Robert S, Debaene B, Mimoz O

机构信息

Département d'anesthésie et de réanimation chirurgicale, centre hospitalo-universitaire La Milétrie, BP 577, 86021 Poitiers, France.

出版信息

Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2003 Nov;22(9):787-97. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2003.08.001.

DOI:10.1016/j.annfar.2003.08.001
PMID:14612166
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the most pertinent data from the literature concerning the use of an antiseptic solution before the elaboration of invasive procedures such as blood cultures, insertion of peripheral or central intravenous catheters, and arterial or epidural catheters, and to identify, if any, the "ideal" antiseptic or, at least, the most efficient.

DATA SOURCES

Review of the literature. Data collected from the Medline database concerning experimental, clinical and basic research studies published between 1966 and 2003 and a manual research of references of relevant papers.

RESULTS

After a brief historic and pharmacological reminder, the results of experimental and clinical studies are presented. Concerning the clinical studies, they concerned almost exclusively iodine products and chlorhexidine. These comparative studies are classified according to the punction site and the antiseptic solution used.

CONCLUSION

Even if the in vitro studies favor iodine products, chlorhexidine in alcoholic solution seems more efficient than povidone iodine in aqueous solution in the clinical setting. Several explanations are suggested to understand the in vitro/in vivo discordances. The place of povidone iodine in alcoholic solution, whose performances on the healthy skin are similar to those of alcoholic chlorhexidine, is being in evaluation.

摘要

目的

在制定诸如血培养、外周或中心静脉导管插入术以及动脉或硬膜外导管插入术等侵入性操作之前,分析文献中关于使用防腐剂溶液的最相关数据,并确定是否存在“理想”的防腐剂,或者至少是最有效的防腐剂。

数据来源

文献综述。从Medline数据库收集1966年至2003年间发表的关于实验、临床和基础研究的资料,并对相关论文的参考文献进行人工检索。

结果

在简短回顾历史和药理学知识后,展示了实验和临床研究的结果。关于临床研究,几乎仅涉及碘制品和洗必泰。这些比较研究根据穿刺部位和所使用的防腐剂溶液进行分类。

结论

尽管体外研究倾向于碘制品,但在临床环境中,酒精溶液中的洗必泰似乎比水溶液中的聚维酮碘更有效。针对体外/体内不一致性提出了几种解释。酒精溶液中聚维酮碘在健康皮肤上的表现与酒精洗必泰相似,其地位正在评估中。

相似文献

1
[Critical review of the literature concerning the comparative use of two antiseptic solutions before intravascular or epidural catheterization].[关于血管内或硬膜外导管插入术前两种防腐剂溶液比较使用的文献综述]
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2003 Nov;22(9):787-97. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2003.08.001.
2
Chlorhexidine versus povidone iodine in preventing colonization of continuous epidural catheters in children: a randomized, controlled trial.洗必泰与聚维酮碘预防儿童连续硬膜外导管定植的随机对照试验
Anesthesiology. 2001 Feb;94(2):239-44. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200102000-00012.
3
Prospective, randomized trial of two antiseptic solutions for prevention of central venous or arterial catheter colonization and infection in intensive care unit patients.两种抗菌溶液预防重症监护病房患者中心静脉或动脉导管定植和感染的前瞻性随机试验。
Crit Care Med. 1996 Nov;24(11):1818-23. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199611000-00010.
4
Cost-effectiveness analysis of chlorhexidine gluconate compared with povidone-iodine solution for catheter-site care in Siriraj Hospital, Thailand.泰国诗里拉吉医院中葡萄糖酸氯己定与聚维酮碘溶液用于导管部位护理的成本效益分析。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2006 Nov;89 Suppl 5:S94-101.
5
Skin antisepsis with chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone iodine-alcohol, with and without skin scrubbing, for prevention of intravascular-catheter-related infection (CLEAN): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, two-by-two factorial trial.氯己定-酒精与聚维酮碘-酒精皮肤消毒,联合或不联合皮肤刷洗,用于预防血管内导管相关感染(CLEAN):一项开放标签、多中心、随机、对照、两因素析因试验。
Lancet. 2015 Nov 21;386(10008):2069-2077. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00244-5. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
6
Prospective randomised trial of povidone-iodine, alcohol, and chlorhexidine for prevention of infection associated with central venous and arterial catheters.聚维酮碘、酒精和氯己定预防中心静脉和动脉导管相关感染的前瞻性随机试验
Lancet. 1991 Aug 10;338(8763):339-43. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)90479-9.
7
Skin disinfection before epidural catheterization: comparative study of povidone-iodine versus chlorhexidine ethanol.硬膜外导管置入术前的皮肤消毒:聚维酮碘与氯己定乙醇的对比研究
Dermatology. 2002;204 Suppl 1:42-6. doi: 10.1159/000057724.
8
Chlorhexidine compared with povidone-iodine solution for vascular catheter-site care: a meta-analysis.氯己定与聚维酮碘溶液用于血管导管部位护理的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2002 Jun 4;136(11):792-801. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-11-200206040-00007.
9
[Critical review of the literature concerning the comparative use of two antiseptic solutions before intravascular or epidural catheterization].[关于血管内或硬膜外导管插入术前两种防腐剂溶液比较使用的文献综述]
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2004 Mar;23(2):164. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2003.12.006.
10
Chlorhexidine-based antiseptic solution vs alcohol-based povidone-iodine for central venous catheter care.用于中心静脉导管护理的氯己定类消毒剂溶液与酒精类聚维酮碘的比较
Arch Intern Med. 2007 Oct 22;167(19):2066-72. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.19.2066.