Suppr超能文献

对于2型糖尿病患者,每日两次的双相门冬胰岛素比每日两次的中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素能更有效地改善餐后血糖控制,且低血糖风险较低。

Twice daily biphasic insulin aspart improves postprandial glycaemic control more effectively than twice daily NPH insulin, with low risk of hypoglycaemia, in patients with type 2 diabetes.

作者信息

Christiansen J S, Vaz J A, Metelko Z, Bogoev M, Dedov I

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Aarhus University Hospital, Kommunehospitalet, Aarhus C, Denmark.

出版信息

Diabetes Obes Metab. 2003 Nov;5(6):446-54. doi: 10.1046/j.1463-1326.2003.00300.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp30) is a dual release formulation, containing 30% soluble and 70% protamine-crystallized insulin aspart. This study compared the glycaemic control and safety profiles achieved with either twice daily BIAsp30 or NPH insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes not optimally controlled by oral hypoglycaemic agents (OHAs), NPH insulin or a combination of both.

METHODS

In this 16-week multinational, parallel-group, double-blind trial, 403 such patients were randomized to receive either BIAsp30 or NPH insulin immediately before breakfast and evening meals. OHAs were discontinued at randomization. Efficacy was assessed by glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and self-recorded daily 8-point blood glucose (BG) profiles. Hypoglycaemic and other adverse events were the chosen safety parameters.

RESULTS

HbA1c concentration decreased by >0.6% (p < 0.0001 vs. baseline) in both groups, with metabolic control continuing to improve throughout the trial without reaching a stable level. Patients who switched from once or twice daily NPH monotherapy to twice daily BIAsp30 achieved a significantly greater reduction in HbA1c (0.78%) than those randomized to twice daily NPH insulin (0.58%; p = 0.03). BIAsp30 decreased mean daily postprandial glycaemic exposure to a greater extent than NPH insulin (mean difference = 0.69 mmol/l; p < 0.0001), reflecting greater decreases in the postbreakfast and postdinner increments (of 1.26 and 1.33 mmol/l, respectively), although postlunch increment was relatively increased (by 0.56 mmol/l). Despite the greater reduction in overall postprandial glycaemic exposure in the BIAsp30 group, the overall safety profile of BIAsp30 was equivalent to that of NPH insulin with <2% of patients experiencing major hypoglycaemia, and approximately 33% reporting minor hypoglycaemic episodes, in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Twice daily BIAsp30 reduced postprandial glucose exposure to a significantly greater extent than NPH insulin and was at least as effective at reducing HbA1c in patients with type 2 diabetes. Both insulins were well tolerated. In patients poorly controlled on OHAs or NPH alone, glycaemic control can be improved by switching to twice daily BIAsp30, without increasing hypoglycaemic risk.

摘要

目的

双相门冬胰岛素30(BIAsp30)是一种双时相释放制剂,含有30%的可溶性门冬胰岛素和70%的精蛋白结晶门冬胰岛素。本研究比较了在口服降糖药(OHAs)、中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素(NPH胰岛素)或二者联合治疗血糖控制不佳的2型糖尿病患者中,每日两次注射BIAsp30或NPH胰岛素在血糖控制和安全性方面的差异。

方法

在这项为期16周的多国、平行组、双盲试验中,403例此类患者被随机分为两组,分别在早餐和晚餐前立即接受BIAsp30或NPH胰岛素治疗。随机分组时停用OHAs。通过糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)和患者自行记录的每日8点血糖(BG)谱评估疗效。低血糖和其他不良事件作为选定的安全性参数。

结果

两组患者的HbA1c浓度均下降>0.6%(与基线相比,p<0.0001),在整个试验过程中代谢控制持续改善,但未达到稳定水平。从每日一次或两次NPH胰岛素单药治疗转换为每日两次BIAsp30治疗的患者,其HbA1c的降低幅度(0.78%)显著大于随机接受每日两次NPH胰岛素治疗的患者(0.58%;p=0.03)。与NPH胰岛素相比,BIAsp30能更大程度地降低每日餐后血糖暴露量(平均差异=0.69 mmol/l;p<0.0001),这反映出早餐后和晚餐后血糖增量的下降幅度更大(分别为1.26和1.33 mmol/l),尽管午餐后血糖增量相对增加(0.56 mmol/l)。尽管BIAsp30组总体餐后血糖暴露量降低幅度更大,但BIAsp30的总体安全性与NPH胰岛素相当,两组中发生严重低血糖的患者均<2%,约33%的患者报告有轻微低血糖发作。

结论

每日两次注射BIAsp30比NPH胰岛素能更大程度地降低餐后血糖暴露量,且在降低2型糖尿病患者HbA1c方面至少同样有效。两种胰岛素的耐受性均良好。对于单独使用OHAs或NPH胰岛素血糖控制不佳的患者,转换为每日两次注射BIAsp30可改善血糖控制,且不增加低血糖风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验