Crockett David J, Prkachin Kenneth M, Craig Kenneth D
Department of Psychiatry, Division of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver B.C. V6T 1W5 Canada.
Pain. 1977 Dec;4(2):175-182. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(77)90131-2.
An empirical determination of the nature and minimum number of dimension necessary to describe responses to the McGill Pain Questionnaire, and a comparison of groups, experiencing clinical or experimentally induced pain, on the dimensions were carried out. Eighty-five patients referred to a low back pain diagnostic clinic and groups of 129 volunteer students exposed to electric shock to pain threshold and pain tolerance levels described their pain using the McGill Pain Questionnaire's descriptive words. An incomplete principle component factor analysis of subjects' ratings suggested that 5 factors should be retained. These factors were judged to reflect: (I) immediated anxiety, (II) perception of harm, (III) somesthetic pressure, (IV) cutaneous sensitivity, and (V) sensory information. Canonical Analysis of Variance and univariate comparisons of back pain, threshold, and tolerance groups on these dimensions were conducted and implications for clinical and laboratory research discussed.
对描述麦吉尔疼痛问卷反应所需维度的性质和最小数量进行了实证研究,并对经历临床或实验性诱发疼痛的组在这些维度上进行了比较。85名被转诊至腰痛诊断诊所的患者以及129名接触电击至疼痛阈值和疼痛耐受水平的志愿者学生组,使用麦吉尔疼痛问卷的描述性词语描述了他们的疼痛。对受试者评分进行的不完全主成分因子分析表明应保留5个因子。这些因子被判定反映:(I)即时焦虑,(II)对伤害的感知,(III)躯体感觉压力,(IV)皮肤敏感性,以及(V)感觉信息。对这些维度上的背痛、阈值和耐受组进行了典型方差分析和单变量比较,并讨论了其对临床和实验室研究的意义。