Schrör Karsten, Weber Artur-Aron
Institut für Pharmakologie und Klinische Pharmakologie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Germany.
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2003 Apr;15(2):71-80. doi: 10.1023/b:thro.0000003308.63022.8d.
GP IIb/IIIa antagonists are qualitatively different from classical antiplatelet agents, such as aspirin or clopidogrel. They do not inhibit platelet activation, i.e. intraplatelet signal generation or conduction but primarily act outside the platelet by competing with ligand (e.g. fibrinogen) binding that is essential for platelet bridging and aggregate formation. Three compounds are in clinical use: abciximab, an antibody fragment and two low-molecular weight compounds, tirofiban and eptifibatide. In comparison to the low-molecular weight compounds, abciximab has a substantially longer platelet half-life (4 h), i.e. slow off-rate and a short plasma half-life (20-30 min) without significant distribution into the extravascular space. The plasma half-life of tirofiban and eptifibatide is about 2 h and parallels the antiplatelet effect. The off-rate from the platelet GP IIb/IIIa receptor is much faster and there is a significant distribution into the extravascular space. These pharmacokinetic variables might influence the competition between the antagonists and fibrinogen for GP IIb/IIIa binding. Other pharmacological variables are a partial agonistic activity, facilitation of thrombolysis, modification of other integrin-related actions, including inflammatory responses, effects on vascular cells and apoptosis. Importantly, GP IIb/IIIa antagonists might also interfere with prothrombin binding to the platelet surface and, thus, might influence the coagulation pathway. There is no clear evidence that the biological activity of the agents is modified by gene polymorphism (HPA-1). All three compounds may cause thrombocytopenia, possibly related to drug-induced antibodies. There is no clear data suggesting that these pharmacological differences transfer into significant differences in clinical outcome, for example in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) subjected to acute percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). The only head-to-head comparison of all three clinically used parenteral compounds did not demonstrate differences in major adverse cardiac effects (MACE) at 30 days although those have been described in particular with long-term use of oral antagonists. The inherent problems with all GP IIb/IIIa antagonists are the narrow therapeutic range because the same mechanisms are involved in hemostasis and thrombosis and their inability to inhibit platelet activation.
糖蛋白IIb/IIIa拮抗剂在性质上不同于传统的抗血小板药物,如阿司匹林或氯吡格雷。它们不抑制血小板活化,即血小板内信号的产生或传导,而是主要通过与配体(如纤维蛋白原)结合竞争在血小板外起作用,而这种结合对于血小板桥接和聚集体形成至关重要。有三种化合物正在临床使用:阿昔单抗,一种抗体片段,以及两种低分子量化合物,替罗非班和依替巴肽。与低分子量化合物相比,阿昔单抗具有显著更长的血小板半衰期(4小时),即解离速率慢,血浆半衰期短(20 - 30分钟),且无明显的血管外间隙分布。替罗非班和依替巴肽的血浆半衰期约为2小时,与抗血小板作用平行。从血小板糖蛋白IIb/IIIa受体的解离速率要快得多,且有明显的血管外间隙分布。这些药代动力学变量可能会影响拮抗剂与纤维蛋白原竞争糖蛋白IIb/IIIa结合。其他药理学变量包括部分激动活性、促进溶栓、改变其他整合素相关作用,包括炎症反应、对血管细胞的影响和细胞凋亡。重要的是,糖蛋白IIb/IIIa拮抗剂也可能干扰凝血酶原与血小板表面的结合,因此可能影响凝血途径。没有明确证据表明基因多态性(HPA - 1)会改变这些药物的生物学活性。所有三种化合物都可能导致血小板减少,可能与药物诱导的抗体有关。没有明确数据表明这些药理学差异会转化为临床结果的显著差异,例如在接受急性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者中。所有三种临床使用的肠外化合物的唯一直接比较未显示30天时主要不良心脏事件(MACE)有差异,尽管长期使用口服拮抗剂时曾有相关描述。所有糖蛋白IIb/IIIa拮抗剂固有的问题是治疗范围狭窄,因为止血和血栓形成涉及相同机制,且它们无法抑制血小板活化。