• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童急性中耳炎:阿莫西林仍是标准抗生素,但仅在某些情况下适用。

Acute otitis media in children: amoxicillin remains the standard antibiotic, but justified in certain situations only.

出版信息

Prescrire Int. 2003 Oct;12(67):184-9.

PMID:14619906
Abstract

(1) The best-assessed antibacterial agents in otitis are penicillin V and amoxicillin. No other antibacterial agents are any more effective in clinical trials. (2) In France, amoxicillin seems the best choice because it is still active against pneumococci with diminished sensitivity to penicillin. Also, amoxicillin causes very few serious adverse effects. (3) There is no firm evidence that clavulanic acid makes amoxicillin any more effective. In fact the combination of amoxicillin + clavulanic acid causes more gastrointestinal adverse effects (including potentially severe diarrhoea) than any other antibacterial agent. (4) For patients who are allergic to penicillin, a macrolide such as erythromycin, or cotrimoxazole, appear to be acceptable first-line alternatives. (5) According to a reliable randomised trial, delaying the decision about antibacterial treatment by 72 hours in children with acute otitis media does no harm. If the decision is delayed, three quarters of children avoid antibacterial therapy altogether. (6) Patients get no extra benefit from extending treatment beyond 5 to 7 days. (7) Prolonged treatment, and the use of low doses are risk factors for subsequent carriage of resistant bacteria. (8) There are no comparative trials of antibacterial agents in children at high risk of severe or complicated disease including infants under 3 months old, children with immunosuppression, and those with high fever.

摘要

(1) 在治疗中耳炎方面,评估最佳的抗菌药物是青霉素V和阿莫西林。在临床试验中,没有其他抗菌药物更有效。(2) 在法国,阿莫西林似乎是最佳选择,因为它对青霉素敏感性降低的肺炎球菌仍有活性。此外,阿莫西林引起的严重不良反应极少。(3) 没有确凿证据表明克拉维酸会使阿莫西林更有效。事实上,阿莫西林 + 克拉维酸组合比任何其他抗菌药物引起更多的胃肠道不良反应(包括潜在的严重腹泻)。(4) 对于青霉素过敏的患者,大环内酯类药物如红霉素或复方新诺明似乎是可接受的一线替代药物。(5) 根据一项可靠的随机试验,对于急性中耳炎患儿,将抗菌治疗的决定推迟72小时并无危害。如果推迟决定,四分之三的儿童可完全避免抗菌治疗。(6) 治疗超过5至7天,患者不会获得额外益处。(7) 延长治疗时间以及使用低剂量是随后携带耐药菌的危险因素。(8) 对于有严重或复杂疾病高风险的儿童,包括3个月以下婴儿、免疫抑制儿童和高热儿童,没有抗菌药物的比较试验。

相似文献

1
Acute otitis media in children: amoxicillin remains the standard antibiotic, but justified in certain situations only.儿童急性中耳炎:阿莫西林仍是标准抗生素,但仅在某些情况下适用。
Prescrire Int. 2003 Oct;12(67):184-9.
2
Acute bacterial rhinosinusitis in pediatric medicine: current issues in diagnosis and management.儿科学中的急性细菌性鼻-鼻窦炎:诊断与管理的当前问题
Paediatr Drugs. 2003;5 Suppl 1:25-33.
3
Comparative efficacy and safety evaluation of cefaclor vs amoxycillin + clavulanate in children with Acute Otitis Media (AOM).头孢克洛与阿莫西林+克拉维酸治疗儿童急性中耳炎(AOM)的疗效与安全性比较评估
Indian J Pediatr. 2005 Mar;72(3):233-8.
4
Otitis media. A scholarly review of the evidence.中耳炎。证据的学术性综述。
Minerva Pediatr. 2003 Oct;55(5):407-14.
5
Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid: a review of its use in the management of paediatric patients with acute otitis media.阿莫西林/克拉维酸:用于治疗小儿急性中耳炎的综述
Drugs. 2003;63(3):311-40. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200363030-00005.
6
Diagnosis and treatment of otitis media.中耳炎的诊断与治疗
Am Fam Physician. 2007 Dec 1;76(11):1650-8.
7
Ceftriaxone and otitis in children: new indication. Only in special circumstances.头孢曲松与儿童中耳炎:新适应症。仅在特殊情况下适用。
Prescrire Int. 2000 Aug;9(48):99-102.
8
Antibiotics in children with acute otitis media?
Prescrire Int. 2003 Aug;12(66):148-50.
9
[Bacterial flora in children with recurrent acute otitis media].[复发性急性中耳炎患儿的细菌菌群]
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2005 Feb;18(104):146-50.
10
Empiric first-line antibiotic treatment of acute otitis in the era of the heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine.七价肺炎球菌结合疫苗时代急性中耳炎的经验性一线抗生素治疗
Pediatrics. 2006 Jun;117(6):e1087-94. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2651.