Suppr超能文献

自动中介还是无中介?对克鲁彻和埃里克森(2000年)的评论

Automatic mediation or absence of mediation? Commentary on Crutcher and Ericsson (2000).

作者信息

Rickard Timothy C, Bajic Daniel

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003 Nov;29(6):1381-6; discussion 1387-9. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.6.1381.

Abstract

R. J. Crutcher and K. A. Ericsson (2000; see record 2000-05419-014) showed that subjects stopped reporting mnemonic mediation in a recall task after sufficient practice. They concluded that subjects continued to use the mediator indefinitely but that its execution eventually became automatic and no longer required access to working memory. Their article thus supports the more general hypothesis that multistep cognition can take place without awareness. In this article the authors evaluate that conclusion on both conceptual and empirical grounds and report results of a new experiment that indicate that a qualitative shift to direct, unmediated recall can occur for at least some tasks.

摘要

R. J. 克鲁彻和K. A. 埃里克森(2000年;见记录2000-05419-014)表明,在进行了足够的练习后,受试者在回忆任务中不再报告记忆中介。他们得出结论,受试者会无限期地继续使用中介,但中介的执行最终会变得自动化,不再需要访问工作记忆。他们的文章因此支持了一个更普遍的假设,即多步骤认知可以在无意识的情况下发生。在本文中,作者从概念和实证两个方面对这一结论进行了评估,并报告了一项新实验的结果,该结果表明,至少对于某些任务,可能会发生向直接的、无中介回忆的质性转变。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验