• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

序列学习领域中编码与检索之间的相互作用。

Interactions between encoding and retrieval in the domain of sequence-learning.

作者信息

Perlman Amotz, Tzelgov Joseph

机构信息

Department of Behavioral Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Jan;32(1):118-30. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.1.118.

DOI:10.1037/0278-7393.32.1.118
PMID:16478345
Abstract

In this article, the authors propose to characterize sequence learning in terms of automatic versus non-automatic processing and to apply this contrast independently to knowledge acquisition and retrieval. In several experiments of sequence learning, automaticity of both the acquisition and retrieval of the acquired knowledge was independently assessed. It was found that the sequence learning order can be demonstrated under all combinations of knowledge acquisition and retrieval. In particular, at least in the simple sequences the authors used, this applies in cases in which both the acquisition and the retrieval of knowledge are strictly automatic--that is, when neither is required for the task nor beneficial to deliberate behavior. The proposed framework has implications for the notion of sequence learning and the investigation of learning in general.

摘要

在本文中,作者提议根据自动加工与非自动加工来描述序列学习,并将这种对比分别应用于知识获取与检索。在序列学习的几个实验中,分别评估了所获知识的获取与检索的自动性。结果发现,在知识获取与检索的所有组合情况下,都能证明序列学习顺序的存在。特别是,至少在作者所使用的简单序列中,当知识的获取与检索都是严格自动的情况下——也就是说,当任务既不需要它们,对刻意行为也没有帮助时,情况就是如此。所提出的框架对序列学习的概念以及一般学习的研究具有启示意义。

相似文献

1
Interactions between encoding and retrieval in the domain of sequence-learning.序列学习领域中编码与检索之间的相互作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Jan;32(1):118-30. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.1.118.
2
Implicit learning of semantic category sequences: response-independent acquisition of abstract sequential regularities.语义类别序列的内隐学习:独立于反应的抽象序列规律习得
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Mar;33(2):394-406. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.394.
3
Automaticity and consciousness: is perceiving the word necessary for reading it?自主性与意识:阅读单词时必须感知该单词吗?
Am J Psychol. 1997 Fall;110(3):429-48.
4
Statistical learning within and between modalities: pitting abstract against stimulus-specific representations.模态内和模态间的统计学习:比较抽象表征与特定刺激表征。
Psychol Sci. 2006 Oct;17(10):905-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01801.x.
5
Attention and preattention in theories of automaticity.自动性理论中的注意与前注意
Am J Psychol. 1992 Summer;105(2):317-39.
6
Implicit task sets in task switching?任务切换中的内隐任务集?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Nov;32(6):1221-33. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.6.1221.
7
A parallel distributed processing approach to automaticity.一种关于自动化的并行分布式处理方法。
Am J Psychol. 1992 Summer;105(2):239-69.
8
Dynamics of the attentional control of word retrieval: analyses of response time distributions.词汇检索的注意控制动态:反应时间分布分析
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2008 May;137(2):303-23. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.303.
9
How incidental sequence learning creates reportable knowledge: the role of unexpected events.偶发序列学习如何创造可报告的知识:意外事件的作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Sep;34(5):1011-26. doi: 10.1037/a0012942.
10
Memory-based processing as a mechanism of automaticity in text comprehension.基于记忆的加工作为文本理解中自动化的一种机制。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Mar;35(2):353-70. doi: 10.1037/a0014733.

引用本文的文献

1
Evidence for Automatic, Stimulus Driven, Arithmetic Processing of Single-digit Multiplication Problems.个位数乘法问题自动的、刺激驱动的算术处理的证据。
J Cogn. 2024 Jun 5;7(1):49. doi: 10.5334/joc.372. eCollection 2024.
2
Sequence Knowledge on and Supports Dual-Tasking.关于[具体内容未给出]和[具体内容未给出]的序列知识支持双重任务。
J Cogn. 2019 Jul 19;2(1):18. doi: 10.5334/joc.76.
3
Task Conflict and Task Control: A Mini-Review.任务冲突与任务控制:一篇小型综述。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 17;10:1598. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01598. eCollection 2019.
4
Testing the controllability of contextual cuing of visual search.测试视觉搜索语境线索控制的可行性。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 3;7:39645. doi: 10.1038/srep39645.
5
Unitization of route knowledge.路线知识的单元化
Psychol Res. 2017 Nov;81(6):1241-1254. doi: 10.1007/s00426-016-0811-0. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
6
What Klein's "Semantic Gradient" Does and Does Not Really Show: Decomposing Stroop Interference into Task and Informational Conflict Components.克莱因的“语义梯度”所展示及未真正展示的内容:将斯特鲁普干扰分解为任务冲突和信息冲突成分。
Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 26;7:249. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00249. eCollection 2016.
7
The neural basis of implicit learning of task-irrelevant Chinese tonal sequence.与任务无关的汉语声调序列内隐学习的神经基础。
Exp Brain Res. 2015 Apr;233(4):1125-36. doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-4184-6. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
8
Does explicit expectation really affect preparation?明确的期望真的会影响准备吗?
Front Psychol. 2012 Oct 1;3:378. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00378. eCollection 2012.
9
Evidence of automatic processing in sequence learning using process-dissociation.使用过程分离法进行序列学习时自动加工的证据。
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2012;8(2):98-108. doi: 10.2478/v10053-008-0107-z. Epub 2012 May 21.
10
Is there evidence for automatic imitation in a strategic context?在策略情境中是否存在自动模仿的证据?
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Aug 22;279(1741):3231-3. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.0500. Epub 2012 May 2.