Baskin Thomas W, Tierney Sandy Callen, Minami Takuya, Wampold Bruce E
Department of Counseling Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 53706, USA.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003 Dec;71(6):973-9. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.71.6.973.
Placebo treatments in psychotherapy cannot adequately control for all common factors, which thereby attenuates their effects vis-a-vis active treatments. In this study, the authors used meta-analytic procedures to test one possible factor contributing to the attenuation of effects: structural inequalities between placebo and active treatments. Structural aspects of the placebo included number and duration of sessions, training of therapist, format of therapy, and restriction of topics. Results indicate that comparisons between active treatments and structurally inequivalent placebos produced larger effects than comparisons between active treatments and structurally equivalent placebos: moreover, the latter comparison produced negligible effects, indicating that active treatments were not demonstrably superior to well-designed placebos.
心理治疗中的安慰剂疗法无法充分控制所有常见因素,因此相对于积极治疗而言,其效果会减弱。在本研究中,作者采用元分析程序来检验导致效果减弱的一个可能因素:安慰剂与积极治疗之间的结构不平等。安慰剂的结构方面包括疗程的数量和时长、治疗师的培训、治疗形式以及话题限制。结果表明,积极治疗与结构不等效的安慰剂之间的比较产生的效果,大于积极治疗与结构等效的安慰剂之间的比较;此外,后一种比较产生的效果微不足道,这表明积极治疗并不明显优于精心设计的安慰剂。