McKiernan Fergus, Faciszewski Tom, Jensen Ron
Center for Bone Diseases, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI, USA. mckiernan.fergus@ marshfieldclinic.org
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Nov 15;28(22):2517-21; disucssion 3. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000092424.29886.C9.
Prospective radiographic analysis of vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) that underwent vertebroplasty.
Illustrate the variability in apparent magnitude of vertebral height restoration when this outcome is reported by four different methods commonly used in the vertebroplasty literature. Propose a consensus method for reporting vertebral height restoration.
Measuring and reporting height restoration of fractured vertebrae presupposes a consensus of method that does not exist. Lack of consensus makes the interpretation of reports and comparison of outcomes of interventions that claim vertebral height restoration difficult.
Preoperative and postoperative standing lateral radiographs of 65 VCFs in 41 patients were compared to assess operative vertebral height restoration. Restorations of vertebral height occurred in 23 instances and were reported by each of the following commonly used methods: (1) absolute restoration in millimeters; (2) percent restoration relative to initial fracture height; (3) percent restoration relative to lost vertebral height; and (4) percent restoration relative to referent vertebral height.
Apparent magnitude of height restoration varied nearly four-fold depending on initial fracture severity and reporting method.
Substantial apparent variability in the reported magnitude of identical height restorations demonstrates the need for a consensus method for measuring, reporting, and interpreting this outcome. Rationale is presented to support the recommendation that reports of vertebral height restoration should: include all index vertebral height dimensions (posterior (Hp), middle (Hm) and anterior (Ha) vertebral height); include absolute measurements of all referent vertebral heights; be reported relative to a referent normative height; include a correction for inter-radiographic measurement error; take into consideration the dynamic mobility of some osteoporotic VCFs; and include the calculated precision error for all measurements.
对接受椎体成形术的椎体压缩骨折(VCF)进行前瞻性影像学分析。
阐明在椎体成形术文献中常用的四种不同方法报告椎体高度恢复的表观幅度时的变异性。提出一种报告椎体高度恢复的共识方法。
测量和报告骨折椎体的高度恢复预先假定了不存在的方法共识。缺乏共识使得对声称椎体高度恢复的报告的解释和干预结果的比较变得困难。
比较41例患者中65处VCF的术前和术后站立位侧位X线片,以评估手术椎体高度恢复情况。椎体高度恢复发生在23例中,并通过以下常用方法分别报告:(1)以毫米为单位的绝对恢复;(2)相对于初始骨折高度的恢复百分比;(3)相对于丢失椎体高度的恢复百分比;(4)相对于参考椎体高度的恢复百分比。
根据初始骨折严重程度和报告方法,高度恢复的表观幅度变化近四倍。
相同高度恢复报告幅度的明显显著变异性表明需要一种测量、报告和解释该结果的共识方法。提出了支持以下建议的理由:椎体高度恢复的报告应包括所有指数椎体高度维度(椎体后高度(Hp)、椎体中高度(Hm)和椎体前高度(Ha));包括所有参考椎体高度的绝对测量值;相对于参考标准高度进行报告;包括对影像学测量误差的校正;考虑一些骨质疏松性VCFs的动态活动度;并包括所有测量值的计算精度误差。