Suppr超能文献

动态骨折活动度在确定急性骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折最佳手术选择中的价值

The Value of Dynamic Fracture Mobility in Determining the Optimum Operation Choice for Acute Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture.

作者信息

Ren Hu, Feng Tao, Hu Yaning, Yao Guangqing, Yu Dahai, Cao Jianhui

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shijiazhuang People's Hospital, Shijiazhuang, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Pain Res. 2022 Aug 13;15:2327-2336. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S368493. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This retrospective study aimed to verify whether the use of a balloon in balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) could offer a higher degree of vertebral height restoration and deformity correction than percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) after adjustment for preoperative dynamic fracture mobility. We expect that this research will help surgeons to determine the optimum operation choice (PVP or BKP) for treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We evaluated retrospectively 262 patients who were treated by PVP or BKP for acute, single-level OVCF at our institution from July 2015 to July 2019. According to the presence or absence of dynamic fracture mobility, the patients were divided into two groups: mobile group and fixed group. We compared the changes in the vertebral height and kyphotic angle for PVP and BKP, respectively, within each group.

RESULTS

In the mobile group, the anterior vertebral height restoration (BKP group, 8.73±5.27%; PVP group, 2.96±1.59%), middle vertebral height restoration (BKP group, 7.58±5.18%; PVP group, 2.74±1.24%) and kyphotic angle correction (BKP group, 4.41±4.46°; PVP group, 1.38±1.60°) due to percutaneous vertebral augmentation technique itself were more obvious in BKP group compared with PVP group (P < 0.05). The BKP group has lower incidence of bone cement leakage (BKP group, 10.17%; PVP group, 25.53%, P < 0.05). In the fixed group, differences from comparison of changes were not statistically significant between PVP and BKP (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The use of a balloon in BKP could offer greater kyphosis correction, higher vertebral body height restoration, and lower cement leakage rate than PVP if a fractured vertebral body existed dynamic mobility. However, all these advantages of BKP over PVP are not obvious and could be overrated for a fixed fracture exhibited no mobility. BKP is recommended for a fractured vertebral body with dynamic mobility. PVP is suggested for a fixed fractured vertebral body with no mobility as it produces similar capability of vertebral height restoration, kyphosis correction, and cement leakage as BKP.

摘要

目的

本回顾性研究旨在验证在调整术前动态骨折活动度后,球囊后凸成形术(BKP)中球囊的使用是否比经皮椎体成形术(PVP)能提供更高程度的椎体高度恢复和畸形矫正。我们期望这项研究将有助于外科医生确定治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(OVCFs)的最佳手术选择(PVP或BKP)。

患者与方法

我们回顾性评估了2015年7月至2019年7月在我院接受PVP或BKP治疗急性单节段OVCF的262例患者。根据是否存在动态骨折活动度,将患者分为两组:活动组和固定组。我们分别比较了每组内PVP和BKP的椎体高度和后凸角变化。

结果

在活动组中,经皮椎体强化技术本身导致的椎体前缘高度恢复(BKP组,8.73±5.27%;PVP组,2.96±1.59%)、椎体中部高度恢复(BKP组,7.58±5.18%;PVP组,2.74±1.24%)和后凸角矫正(BKP组,4.41±4.46°;PVP组,1.38±1.60°)在BKP组比PVP组更明显(P<0.05)。BKP组骨水泥渗漏发生率较低(BKP组,10.17%;PVP组,25.53%,P<0.05)。在固定组中,PVP和BKP之间变化比较的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

如果骨折椎体存在动态活动度,BKP中球囊的使用比PVP能提供更大的后凸矫正、更高的椎体高度恢复和更低的骨水泥渗漏率。然而,BKP相对于PVP的所有这些优势并不明显,对于无活动度的固定骨折可能被高估。对于有动态活动度的骨折椎体,建议采用BKP。对于无活动度的固定骨折椎体,建议采用PVP,因为它在椎体高度恢复、后凸矫正和骨水泥渗漏方面与BKP具有相似的能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2cb/9386056/6ab1868f8569/JPR-15-2327-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验