Helweg-Larsen K
Københavns Universitet, Retspatologisk Institut.
Ugeskr Laeger. 1992 Nov 30;154(49):3477-82.
Delimitation of the sudden unexplained infant death syndrome (SIDS) is difficult as the diagnosis is made by exclusion. The difficulties in the differential diagnosis are concentrated on interpretation of the significance of positive viral and bacterial findings, inflammatory changes in the respiratory organs, heart and central nervous system together with malformations. Classification of SIDS appears, therefore, to vary according to time and place. New techniques, e.g. DNA analysis, have explained the etiology in a few per cent of the cases but have not yet solved the riddle of SIDS. The article reviews hypotheses about apnoea, arrhythmia, overheating and inefficient surveillance of the infant. It is emphasized that assessment of risk factors for SIDS requires valid epidemiological investigations where the basis for the diagnosis is a uniform classification of SIDS infants as compared with other groups of sudden death in infancy. An investigation of this nature has been initiated in the Nordic countries. It is important to examine and treat infants with abnormal sleep apnoea but generalized employment of monitoring has not reduced the number of unexplained infantile deaths.
婴儿猝死综合征(SIDS)的界定很困难,因为其诊断是通过排除法做出的。鉴别诊断的难点集中在对病毒和细菌检测阳性结果、呼吸器官、心脏及中枢神经系统的炎症变化以及畸形的意义的解读上。因此,SIDS的分类似乎会因时间和地点而有所不同。新技术,如DNA分析,已在少数病例中解释了病因,但尚未解开SIDS之谜。本文回顾了关于呼吸暂停、心律失常、过热以及对婴儿监测不力的假说。需要强调的是,对SIDS危险因素的评估需要有效的流行病学调查,其中SIDS婴儿的诊断依据应与婴儿期其他猝死组有统一的分类。北欧国家已启动了此类调查。检查和治疗睡眠呼吸暂停异常的婴儿很重要,但普遍采用监测并未减少不明原因的婴儿死亡数量。