du Toit P J, van Aswegen C H, Steyn P L, Pols A, du Plessis D J
Wolmarans Research Laboratory, Department of Urology, H.F. Verwoerd Hospital, Pretoria, Republic of South Africa.
Urol Res. 1992;20(6):393-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00294494.
It has been hypothesized that urinary urokinase and sialidase may play a role in urolithiasis. If these theories have substance it is to be expected that microorganisms may also affect these enzymes, since the association between urinary tract infection and renal stone formation is well known. It is generally assumed that Proteus mirabilis and Staphylococcus albus, which produce the urea-splitting enzyme urease, are responsible for stone formation. However, the importance of non-urease-producing microorganisms (Escherichia coli and Enterococcus) in urolithiasis is unclear. Spectrophotometric studies were therefore devised to clarify this problem. Microorganisms associated with infection-induced stones (Proteus mirabilis and Escherichia coli) respectively inhibited the urokinase and stimulated the sialidase activity. In contrast, microorganisms which were not associated with infection stones (Bacillus subtilis) had significantly less effect on urokinase and sialidase activity. This study may explain infection-induced stone formation and could open a completely new line of research.
据推测,尿激酶和唾液酸酶可能在尿路结石形成中起作用。如果这些理论有依据,那么可以预期微生物也可能影响这些酶,因为尿路感染与肾结石形成之间的关联是众所周知的。一般认为,产生尿素分解酶脲酶的奇异变形杆菌和白色葡萄球菌是结石形成的原因。然而,不产生脲酶的微生物(大肠杆菌和肠球菌)在尿路结石形成中的重要性尚不清楚。因此,设计了分光光度法研究来阐明这个问题。与感染性结石相关的微生物(奇异变形杆菌和大肠杆菌)分别抑制尿激酶并刺激唾液酸酶活性。相比之下,与感染性结石无关的微生物(枯草芽孢杆菌)对尿激酶和唾液酸酶活性的影响要小得多。这项研究可能解释感染性结石的形成,并可能开辟一个全新的研究领域。