Nitzschke E, Wiegand M
Orthopädische Universitätsklinik Bochum.
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1992 Sep-Oct;130(5):371-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1039637.
In the present study the diagnosis from 1221 letters of discharge of the years 1986 and 1987 were additionally coded by the documentation doctor of the orthopaedic department and compared with the documentation sheets and the computer lists of the administration. Supplementary to this after one year there was carried out an additional coding of the letters by the documentation doctor. The transfer errors of the administration were amounting to 1.72 p.c. with regard to three digit numbers and to 11.87 p.c. with regard to four digit coding. During the repeated examination the documentation doctor made an error of 4.3 p.c. for the three digit coding and of 15.6 p.c. if the maximum coding was required. The corresponding errors of the house physicians for three digit numbers (maximum) were amounting to 8 p.c. (33.6 p.c.) for frequent diagnoses, to 28 p.c. (48.5 p.c.) for rare diagnoses and totally 13.7 p.c. (37.8 p.c.). In the present documentation validity and reliability still shows a good result compared to other studies. Nevertheless a documentation with an error rate to such an extend is of no use for a base documentation, and this error rate must be taken into consideration in the interpretation of global medical statistics. Automatic coding systems integrated into medical writing service seems to be the only help in view of removing these problems.
在本研究中,骨科记录医生对1986年和1987年的1221份出院记录进行了额外编码,并与行政部门的记录单和计算机列表进行了比较。在此之后,一年后记录医生又对这些记录进行了一次额外编码。行政部门的转抄错误在三位数编码方面为1.72%,在四位数编码方面为11.87%。在重复检查中,记录医生在三位数编码时出现了4.3%的错误,在需要最大编码时出现了15.6%的错误。住院医生在三位数编码(最大)方面,常见诊断的相应错误率为8%(33.6%),罕见诊断的相应错误率为28%(48.5%),总体错误率为13.7%(37.8%)。与其他研究相比,在目前的记录中,有效性和可靠性仍显示出良好的结果。然而,如此高错误率的记录对于基础记录毫无用处,在解释整体医学统计数据时必须考虑到这个错误率。鉴于要消除这些问题,集成到医学写作服务中的自动编码系统似乎是唯一的帮助。