Sigall H
Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
J Appl Soc Psychol. 1997 Apr;27(7):574-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb00648.x.
The ethics of using deception in research are discussed, and Aguinis and Handelsman's (1997) arguments that research using the bogus pipeline (BPL), in particular, is unethical are reviewed and critiqued. Stances that view any deception research as unethical may be reasonable, and lead to the conclusion that BPL research is unethical. However, if the position taken is that deception research may be ethically acceptable, then there is not basis for concluding that BPL research is intrinsically unethical. The same considerations that are taken into account when deciding whether any deception in research is ethical apply to decisions about the ethical appropriateness of using the BPL.
本文讨论了研究中使用欺骗手段的伦理问题，并对阿吉尼斯和汉德尔斯曼（1997）提出的观点进行了回顾和批判，他们认为使用假管道技术（BPL）的研究尤其不道德。认为任何欺骗性研究都不道德的立场可能是合理的，并得出BPL研究不道德的结论。然而，如果所持立场是欺骗性研究在伦理上可能是可以接受的，那么就没有理由得出BPL研究本质上不道德的结论。在决定研究中的任何欺骗行为是否合乎伦理时所考虑的相同因素，也适用于决定使用BPL的伦理适当性。
