Suppr超能文献

A comparison of ten different methods for the analysis of saturates, olefins, benzene, total aromatics, and oxygenates in finished gasolines.

作者信息

Beens Jan, Feuerhelm Hans Thomas, Fröhling Jörg-Christian, Watt Jerry, Schaatsbergen Gertjan

机构信息

Vrije Universiteit, Department of Analytical Chemistry and Applied Spectroscopy, de Boelelaan 1083, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Chromatogr Sci. 2003 Nov-Dec;41(10):564-9. doi: 10.1093/chromsci/41.10.564.

Abstract

The Technical Committee 19 of the European Committee for Standardization (CEN/TC19) in the "Lisbon resolution" requested to evaluate replacement methods to the fluorescent indicator absorption (FIA) (American Standardization for Testing and Material D 1319) method for the determination of aromatics and olefins in gasolines. In the same resolution it was requested to review the two existing methods for the determination of benzene content of gasolines, anticipating lower limit values in future European gasoline specifications. As a result of this request, a round robin (RR) was organized in which 8 gasoline samples are analyzed using 10 different methods in 33 laboratories. The methods used in the RR include, apart from the FIA method, one-dimensional gas chromatography (GC) and multidimensional GC, with and without specific detectors and spectroscopic analysis methods. This study describes these methods in short, gives an evaluation of the results of the RR, and draws a conclusion on the outcome.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验