Suppr超能文献

能够揭示血脑屏障通透性的分离方法。

Separation methods that are capable of revealing blood-brain barrier permeability.

作者信息

Dash Alekha K, Elmquist William F

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Health Professions, Creighton University Medical Center, 2500 California Plaza, Omaha, NE 68178, USA.

出版信息

J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2003 Nov 25;797(1-2):241-54. doi: 10.1016/s1570-0232(03)00605-6.

Abstract

The objective of this review is to emphasize the application of separation science in evaluating the blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability to drugs and bioactive agents. Several techniques have been utilized to quantitate the BBB permeability. These methods can be classified into two major categories: in vitro or in vivo. The in vivo methods used include brain homogenization, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sampling, voltametry, autoradiography, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, positron emission tomography (PET), intracerebral microdialysis, and brain uptake index (BUI) determination. The in vitro methods include tissue culture and immobilized artificial membrane (IAM) technology. Separation methods have always played an important role as adjunct methods to the methods outlined above for the quantitation of BBB permeability and have been utilized the most with brain homogenization, in situ brain perfusion, CSF sampling, intracerebral microdialysis, in vitro tissue culture and IAM chromatography. However, the literature published to date indicates that the separation method has been used the most in conjunction with intracerebral microdialysis and CSF sampling methods. The major advantages of microdialysis sampling in BBB permeability studies is the possibility of online separation and quantitation as well as the need for only a small sample volume for such an analysis. Separation methods are preferred over non-separation methods in BBB permeability evaluation for two main reasons. First, when the selectivity of a determination method is insufficient, interfering substances must be separated from the analyte of interest prior to determination. Secondly, when large number of analytes is to be detected and quantitated by a single analytical procedure, the mixture must be separated to each individual component prior to determination. Chiral separation in particular can be essential to evaluate the stereo-selective permeation and distribution of agents into the brain. In conclusion, the usefulness of separation methods during BBB permeability evaluation is immense and more application of these methods is foreseen in the future.

摘要

本综述的目的是强调分离科学在评估血脑屏障(BBB)对药物和生物活性剂的通透性方面的应用。已经使用了几种技术来定量血脑屏障的通透性。这些方法可分为两大类:体外或体内方法。所使用的体内方法包括脑匀浆法、脑脊液(CSF)采样法、伏安法、放射自显影法、核磁共振(NMR)光谱法、正电子发射断层扫描(PET)法、脑内微透析法和脑摄取指数(BUI)测定法。体外方法包括组织培养和固定化人工膜(IAM)技术。在上述定量血脑屏障通透性的方法中,分离方法一直作为辅助方法发挥着重要作用,并且在脑匀浆法、原位脑灌注法、脑脊液采样法、脑内微透析法、体外组织培养法和IAM色谱法中使用最为广泛。然而,迄今为止发表的文献表明,分离方法在与脑内微透析法和脑脊液采样法结合使用时最为普遍。微透析采样在血脑屏障通透性研究中的主要优点是可以进行在线分离和定量,并且这种分析只需要少量样本。在血脑屏障通透性评估中,分离方法优于非分离方法主要有两个原因。首先,当测定方法的选择性不足时,在测定之前必须将干扰物质与目标分析物分离。其次,当要通过单一分析程序检测和定量大量分析物时,必须在测定之前将混合物分离成各个单独的组分。特别是手性分离对于评估药物进入大脑的立体选择性渗透和分布可能至关重要。总之,分离方法在血脑屏障通透性评估中的作用巨大,预计未来这些方法将得到更多应用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验