Suppr超能文献

856例疑似ANCA相关疾病连续患者中免疫荧光和ELISA检测的试验特征。

Test characteristics of immunofluorescence and ELISA tests in 856 consecutive patients with possible ANCA-associated conditions.

作者信息

Stone J H, Talor M, Stebbing J, Uhlfelder M L, Rose N R, Carson K A, Hellmann D B, Burek C L

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University Vasculitis Center, 1830 E. Monument Street, Suite 7500, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

出版信息

Arthritis Care Res. 2000 Dec;13(6):424-34. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200012)13:6<424::aid-art14>3.0.co;2-q.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the test characteristics of immunofluorescence (IF) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) in a consecutive series of patients under evaluation for anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV).

METHODS

Using stored sera, we performed a cross-sectional study on 856 consecutive patients tested prospectively for ANCA by IF, Based on guidelines from the 1994 Chapel Hill Consensus Conference (CHCC), we determined each patient's underlying diagnosis by a medical records review without regard to their ANCA status (the CHCC guidelines do not require ANCA as a prerequisite for diagnosis). We grouped patients with forms of vasculitis commonly associated with ANCA into one of 4 types of AAV: Wegener's granulomatosis (n = 45), microscopic polyangiitis (n = 12), Churg-Strauss syndrome (n = 4), and pauci-immune glomerulonephritis (n = 8). We also classified patients without clinical evidence of AAV (92% of all patients tested) into 5 predefined categories of disease (including "other") and an additional category for no identifiable disease. In a blinded fashion, we then performed ELISAs on the stored serum for antibodies to proteinase-3 (PR3) and myeloperoxidase (MPO) and calculated the test characteristics for both ANCA assay techniques.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine of the 856 patients (8.1%) had clinical diagnoses of AAV based on CHCC guidelines. The positive predictive value (PPV) of ELISA for AAV was superior to that of IF, 83% versus 45%. For patients with both positive IF tests and positive ELISA tests, the PPV increased to 88%. Both IF and ELISA had high negative predictive values (97% and 96%, respectively). Positive ELISA tests were associated with higher likelihood ratios (LR) than IF (54.2 [95% CI = 26.3, 111.5] versus 9.4 [95% CI = 6.9, 12.7]). The LR of both a positive IF and a positive ELISA was 82.1 (95% CI = 33.3, 202.5).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with IF, an ELISA test fo ANCA was associated with a substantially higher PPV and LR for AAV. This fact, combined with the greater sensitivity of IF, suggests that an effective testing strategy is to perform ELISA tests only on samples that are positive for ANCA by IF.

摘要

目的

在一系列连续接受抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体(ANCA)相关血管炎(AAV)评估的患者中,检测免疫荧光法(IF)和酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)的检测特性。

方法

我们使用储存的血清,对856例连续接受IF法前瞻性检测ANCA的患者进行了横断面研究。根据1994年查珀尔希尔共识会议(CHCC)的指南,我们通过病历审查确定每位患者的潜在诊断,而不考虑其ANCA状态(CHCC指南不要求将ANCA作为诊断的先决条件)。我们将通常与ANCA相关的血管炎形式的患者分为4种AAV类型之一:韦格纳肉芽肿(n = 45)、显微镜下多血管炎(n = 12)、变应性肉芽肿性血管炎(n = 4)和寡免疫性肾小球肾炎(n = 8)。我们还将无AAV临床证据的患者(占所有检测患者的92%)分为5个预定义疾病类别(包括“其他”)和一个无明确疾病的附加类别。然后,我们以盲法对储存的血清进行ELISA检测,以检测抗蛋白酶-3(PR3)和髓过氧化物酶(MPO)抗体,并计算两种ANCA检测技术的检测特性。

结果

根据CHCC指南,856例患者中有69例(8.1%)临床诊断为AAV。ELISA对AAV的阳性预测值(PPV)优于IF,分别为83%和45%。对于IF检测和ELISA检测均为阳性的患者,PPV增至88%。IF和ELISA均具有较高的阴性预测值(分别为97%和96%)。ELISA阳性检测的似然比(LR)高于IF(54.2 [95% CI = 26.3, 111.5] 对 9.4 [95% CI = 6.9, 12.7])。IF阳性和ELISA阳性的LR为82.1(95% CI = 33.3, 202.5)。

结论

与IF相比,ANCA的ELISA检测对AAV的PPV和LR显著更高。这一事实,再加上IF更高的敏感性,表明一种有效的检测策略是仅对IF检测ANCA呈阳性的样本进行ELISA检测。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验